Hi Scott, will copy the [email protected] in future,
regards, Hans On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 23:57 -0800, Scott Gray wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean by "normally", I haven't seen anything come > through here about the subdomains and certificates requests other than you > mentioning it in related threads. The email to cc for anything related to > project infrastructure is the private list, i.e. [email protected] > > Regards > Scott > > On 1/02/2010, at 11:44 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > > > I copy this mailinglist normally, is there any specific emailadress that > > should be copied? > > > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 23:35 -0800, Scott Gray wrote: > >> Hi Hans, > >> > >> Thanks for helping to get this stuff sorted out, but could you please > >> remember to cc the PMC on any infra requests you send out (it's part of > >> the ASF guidelines for this sort of thing). > >> > >> Thanks > >> Scott > >> > >> HotWax Media > >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >> > >> On 1/02/2010, at 11:01 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >> > >>> they seem to have a regular maintenance going and promised to get it > >>> back as quick as possible. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Hans > >>> > >>> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 23:48 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>> Thanks Hans - I've been seeing that and it's appreciated. Can you get > >>>> the standard trunk version up in the meantime though? Why is it having > >>>> so much trouble? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Ruppert > >>>> > >>>> On Feb 1, 2010, at 11:43 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I am pushing the infra team for subdomains and certificates > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 16:55 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>>>> The site has been updated and I've pushed it - will take about 30 > >>>>>> minutes to propagate. I have also put these redirects in place for > >>>>>> bookmarks. Hans, when you're back around, can you work with the infra > >>>>>> team to get these servers up? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks in advance. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> Ruppert > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Feb 1, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sorry - I wasn't more clear here. What I meant to say is that: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 1. I will put the redirects in place > >>>>>>> -- There are tons of people out there with bookmarks and I'd rather > >>>>>>> not have them just get an error. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 2. And I will update the links on the site so that it will remove the > >>>>>>> dependency in general. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If I shouldn't put the redirects in place now that you know what I > >>>>>>> meant to say (sorry for not being clear), then I can definitely do > >>>>>>> that - but my guess is that both would be a reasonable idea for the > >>>>>>> transition. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>> Ruppert > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I'm not sure if I understand correctly, but what is there to put in > >>>>>>>> place? Are you thinking of trying to set things up so that the old > >>>>>>>> URLs are supported? If so, why? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Why not just change the links instead of putting forwards and such in > >>>>>>>> place, which are going to be temporary anyway and also still leave a > >>>>>>>> dependency on Contegix (which I don't think is a good idea)? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -David > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Jacques, Hans, since you guys have been very active in migrating > >>>>>>>> this information to the ASF infra, I'm leaning on you to help me know > >>>>>>>> when and how you'd like me to put this stuff in place. It looks like > >>>>>>>> the four I've listed below are in place - but I'm not sure what the > >>>>>>>> plan was on the others. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I'm happy to help in any way, but I'm just supporting I don't know > >>>>>>>> what the intentions are of the people getting this stuff moved over. > >>>>>>>> Let me know! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>> Ruppert > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Here are the links that I know about - but there are many others > >>>>>>>> that need to be thought about in this migration: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> build.ofbiz.org - http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/ > >>>>>>>>>> api.ofbiz.org - http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ > >>>>>>>>>> demo.ofbiz.org - http://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/ecommerce/ > >>>>>>>>>> -- Not sure where the other demos are .... > >>>>>>>>>> demo.ofbiz.org backend - > >>>>>>>> https://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/catalog/control/main > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> There are a few others that I don't know about: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> demo904.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>>>>>>> demo40.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>>>>>>> bigfiles.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>>>>>>> www.ofbiz.org > >>>>>>>>>> svn.ofbiz.org > >>>>>>>>>> etc > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Anyways, I can make these happen ASAP since the DNS is still at > >>>>>>>> Contegix until it migrates to ASF shortly (at least that's what I'm > >>>>>>>> hearing) - so please let me know what you'd like to do - and what > >>>>>>>> you're changing on the site so that I can support these changes. I > >>>>>>>> look forward to getting this up on ASF infra since that's where > >>>>>>>> everyone wanted to be going. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>> Ruppert > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert > >>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media > >>>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 > >>>>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 5:13 PM, David E Jones wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I do still own the domain. It expires in May of this year, > >>>>>>>> and I've been planning to transfer it to the ASF (if they want it, > >>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>> sure if/how that works...) closer to before it expires. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Right now the domain is managed by name servers at Contegix so > >>>>>>>> that they could maintain things more easily. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I can point it back to name servers that I control and then point > >>>>>>>> the various sub-domains wherever, and perhaps at this point that's > >>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>> best thing to do. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> How is the server at that IP address setup? I tried going to the > >>>>>>>> plain IP in the browser and it won't respond, which makes me wonder > >>>>>>>> if > >>>>>>>> everything running on it is setup by virtual domain. If that's the > >>>>>>>> case then it will need to be ready to have demo.ofbiz.org pointed to > >>>>>>>> it. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Also, is there just one demo setup over there for the trunk, or > >>>>>>>> are there various demos setup for release4.0 and release09.04? If > >>>>>>>> there is just one demo then I don't think we should point > >>>>>>>> demo904.ofbiz.org over. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> BTW, I've moved this over to the dev mailing list since it's more > >>>>>>>> of a project management thing. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On a related topic: a better solution overall would be to change > >>>>>>>> all of the links to the new ASF sub-domains since that is the more > >>>>>>>> permanent home for all of these resources. I'm not sure if the ASF > >>>>>>>> has > >>>>>>>> a policy on this, but I do think that keeping everything under the > >>>>>>>> apache.org domain and under infra control is the best way to go. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -David > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Who has control over ofbiz.org? David? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> what we can do is point this domainname to the apache vm so we > >>>>>>>> can keep > >>>>>>>>>>>> on using the ssl certificates.... > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> do put: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> demo.ofbiz.org to 140.211.11.41 > >>>>>>>>>>>> demo904.ofbiz.org to 140.211.11.41 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> i will ask infra for a second ip.... > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hans > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > >>> > >> > > -- > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > > > -- Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
