I copy this mailinglist normally, is there any specific emailadress that should be copied?
Regards, Hans On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 23:35 -0800, Scott Gray wrote: > Hi Hans, > > Thanks for helping to get this stuff sorted out, but could you please > remember to cc the PMC on any infra requests you send out (it's part of the > ASF guidelines for this sort of thing). > > Thanks > Scott > > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > On 1/02/2010, at 11:01 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > > > they seem to have a regular maintenance going and promised to get it > > back as quick as possible. > > > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 23:48 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >> Thanks Hans - I've been seeing that and it's appreciated. Can you get the > >> standard trunk version up in the meantime though? Why is it having so > >> much trouble? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Ruppert > >> > >> On Feb 1, 2010, at 11:43 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >> > >>> I am pushing the infra team for subdomains and certificates > >>> > >>> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 16:55 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>> The site has been updated and I've pushed it - will take about 30 > >>>> minutes to propagate. I have also put these redirects in place for > >>>> bookmarks. Hans, when you're back around, can you work with the infra > >>>> team to get these servers up? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks in advance. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Ruppert > >>>> > >>>> On Feb 1, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Sorry - I wasn't more clear here. What I meant to say is that: > >>>>> > >>>>> 1. I will put the redirects in place > >>>>> -- There are tons of people out there with bookmarks and I'd rather not > >>>>> have them just get an error. > >>>>> > >>>>> 2. And I will update the links on the site so that it will remove the > >>>>> dependency in general. > >>>>> > >>>>> If I shouldn't put the redirects in place now that you know what I > >>>>> meant to say (sorry for not being clear), then I can definitely do that > >>>>> - but my guess is that both would be a reasonable idea for the > >>>>> transition. > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Ruppert > >>>>> > >>>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I'm not sure if I understand correctly, but what is there to put in > >>>>>> place? Are you thinking of trying to set things up so that the old > >>>>>> URLs are supported? If so, why? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Why not just change the links instead of putting forwards and such in > >>>>>> place, which are going to be temporary anyway and also still leave a > >>>>>> dependency on Contegix (which I don't think is a good idea)? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -David > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Feb 1, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jacques, Hans, since you guys have been very active in migrating > >>>>>> this information to the ASF infra, I'm leaning on you to help me know > >>>>>> when and how you'd like me to put this stuff in place. It looks like > >>>>>> the four I've listed below are in place - but I'm not sure what the > >>>>>> plan was on the others. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm happy to help in any way, but I'm just supporting I don't know > >>>>>> what the intentions are of the people getting this stuff moved over. > >>>>>> Let me know! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>> Ruppert > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Here are the links that I know about - but there are many others > >>>>>> that need to be thought about in this migration: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> build.ofbiz.org - http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/ > >>>>>>>> api.ofbiz.org - http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ > >>>>>>>> demo.ofbiz.org - http://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/ecommerce/ > >>>>>>>> -- Not sure where the other demos are .... > >>>>>>>> demo.ofbiz.org backend - > >>>>>> https://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/catalog/control/main > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> There are a few others that I don't know about: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> demo904.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>>>>> demo40.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>>>>> bigfiles.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>>>>> www.ofbiz.org > >>>>>>>> svn.ofbiz.org > >>>>>>>> etc > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Anyways, I can make these happen ASAP since the DNS is still at > >>>>>> Contegix until it migrates to ASF shortly (at least that's what I'm > >>>>>> hearing) - so please let me know what you'd like to do - and what > >>>>>> you're changing on the site so that I can support these changes. I > >>>>>> look forward to getting this up on ASF infra since that's where > >>>>>> everyone wanted to be going. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>> Ruppert > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert > >>>>>>>> HotWax Media > >>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 > >>>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 5:13 PM, David E Jones wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Yes, I do still own the domain. It expires in May of this year, > >>>>>> and I've been planning to transfer it to the ASF (if they want it, not > >>>>>> sure if/how that works...) closer to before it expires. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Right now the domain is managed by name servers at Contegix so > >>>>>> that they could maintain things more easily. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I can point it back to name servers that I control and then point > >>>>>> the various sub-domains wherever, and perhaps at this point that's the > >>>>>> best thing to do. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> How is the server at that IP address setup? I tried going to the > >>>>>> plain IP in the browser and it won't respond, which makes me wonder if > >>>>>> everything running on it is setup by virtual domain. If that's the > >>>>>> case then it will need to be ready to have demo.ofbiz.org pointed to > >>>>>> it. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Also, is there just one demo setup over there for the trunk, or > >>>>>> are there various demos setup for release4.0 and release09.04? If > >>>>>> there is just one demo then I don't think we should point > >>>>>> demo904.ofbiz.org over. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> BTW, I've moved this over to the dev mailing list since it's more > >>>>>> of a project management thing. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On a related topic: a better solution overall would be to change > >>>>>> all of the links to the new ASF sub-domains since that is the more > >>>>>> permanent home for all of these resources. I'm not sure if the ASF has > >>>>>> a policy on this, but I do think that keeping everything under the > >>>>>> apache.org domain and under infra control is the best way to go. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -David > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Who has control over ofbiz.org? David? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> what we can do is point this domainname to the apache vm so we > >>>>>> can keep > >>>>>>>>>> on using the ssl certificates.... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> do put: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> demo.ofbiz.org to 140.211.11.41 > >>>>>>>>>> demo904.ofbiz.org to 140.211.11.41 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> i will ask infra for a second ip.... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> regards, > >>>>>>>>>> Hans > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > >>> > >> > > -- > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > > > -- Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
