Sorry - I wasn't more clear here. What I meant to say is that: 1. I will put the redirects in place -- There are tons of people out there with bookmarks and I'd rather not have them just get an error.
2. And I will update the links on the site so that it will remove the dependency in general. If I shouldn't put the redirects in place now that you know what I meant to say (sorry for not being clear), then I can definitely do that - but my guess is that both would be a reasonable idea for the transition. Cheers, Ruppert ----- "David E Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure if I understand correctly, but what is there to put in > place? Are you thinking of trying to set things up so that the old > URLs are supported? If so, why? > > Why not just change the links instead of putting forwards and such in > place, which are going to be temporary anyway and also still leave a > dependency on Contegix (which I don't think is a good idea)? > > -David > > > On Feb 1, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > > > Jacques, Hans, since you guys have been very active in migrating > this information to the ASF infra, I'm leaning on you to help me know > when and how you'd like me to put this stuff in place. It looks like > the four I've listed below are in place - but I'm not sure what the > plan was on the others. > > > > I'm happy to help in any way, but I'm just supporting I don't know > what the intentions are of the people getting this stuff moved over. > Let me know! > > > > Cheers, > > Ruppert > > > > On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > > > >> Here are the links that I know about - but there are many others > that need to be thought about in this migration: > >> > >> build.ofbiz.org - http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/ > >> api.ofbiz.org - http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/ > >> demo.ofbiz.org - http://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/ecommerce/ > >> -- Not sure where the other demos are .... > >> demo.ofbiz.org backend - > https://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/catalog/control/main > >> > >> There are a few others that I don't know about: > >> > >> demo904.hotwaxmedia.com > >> demo40.hotwaxmedia.com > >> bigfiles.hotwaxmedia.com > >> www.ofbiz.org > >> svn.ofbiz.org > >> etc > >> > >> Anyways, I can make these happen ASAP since the DNS is still at > Contegix until it migrates to ASF shortly (at least that's what I'm > hearing) - so please let me know what you'd like to do - and what > you're changing on the site so that I can support these changes. I > look forward to getting this up on ASF infra since that's where > everyone wanted to be going. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Ruppert > >> -- > >> Tim Ruppert > >> HotWax Media > >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >> > >> o:801.649.6594 > >> f:801.649.6595 > >> > >> On Jan 31, 2010, at 5:13 PM, David E Jones wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Yes, I do still own the domain. It expires in May of this year, > and I've been planning to transfer it to the ASF (if they want it, not > sure if/how that works...) closer to before it expires. > >>> > >>> Right now the domain is managed by name servers at Contegix so > that they could maintain things more easily. > >>> > >>> I can point it back to name servers that I control and then point > the various sub-domains wherever, and perhaps at this point that's the > best thing to do. > >>> > >>> How is the server at that IP address setup? I tried going to the > plain IP in the browser and it won't respond, which makes me wonder if > everything running on it is setup by virtual domain. If that's the > case then it will need to be ready to have demo.ofbiz.org pointed to > it. > >>> > >>> Also, is there just one demo setup over there for the trunk, or > are there various demos setup for release4.0 and release09.04? If > there is just one demo then I don't think we should point > demo904.ofbiz.org over. > >>> > >>> BTW, I've moved this over to the dev mailing list since it's more > of a project management thing. > >>> > >>> On a related topic: a better solution overall would be to change > all of the links to the new ASF sub-domains since that is the more > permanent home for all of these resources. I'm not sure if the ASF has > a policy on this, but I do think that keeping everything under the > apache.org domain and under infra control is the best way to go. > >>> > >>> -David > >>> > >>> > >>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >>> > >>>> Who has control over ofbiz.org? David? > >>>> > >>>> what we can do is point this domainname to the apache vm so we > can keep > >>>> on using the ssl certificates.... > >>>> > >>>> do put: > >>>> > >>>> demo.ofbiz.org to 140.211.11.41 > >>>> demo904.ofbiz.org to 140.211.11.41 > >>>> > >>>> i will ask infra for a second ip.... > >>>> > >>>> regards, > >>>> Hans > >>>> -- > >>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
