Sorry - writing on mobile devices while traveling is never a good idea - guess I need one of those messages that tries to apologies for having fingers bigger than a mobile keyboard :) - here's what I was saying without all of the duh built in:
>> My fellow committer (this time you are that fellow committer Adam) has his >> terseness in response - but I have to admit that I'd rather have him >> consistently call that spade a spade than to give up on improving the >> quality of our shared project just because he's too busy to help to do it >> right ... Building a completely new implementations or feature is one >> thing, but when you're enhancing functionality that already exists in the >> system (eg like struggling to name the new component because it's a copy of >> an existing component) we've got to have more dedication to earlier >> collaboration. Just trying not to get personal again - this isn't about the person, but the lack of comm and the confusing nature of what we ended up with as a community. Cheers, Ruppert On Feb 4, 2010, at 11:31 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > Tim Ruppert wrote: >> My fellow committer has his terseness in response - but I have to admit that >> I'd rather have him consistently call that spade a spade not too because >> he's just too busy to help to do it right ... Completely new >> implementations are one thing, but when you're replacing existing >> functionality we've got to have more dedication to earlier collaboration IMO. > > Huh? You're english leaves much to be desired. Could you rewrite > that in a more intelligible way? I couldn't quite parse it. > > (I think I get the gist of what you are saying, but there are ways it > could be misunderstood, and it would be nice to have those cleared up)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
