On 4/03/2010, at 10:43 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> From: "Scott Gray" <scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com> >> On 4/03/2010, at 10:12 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>> From: "Scott Gray" <scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com> >>> On 4/03/2010, at 9:30 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>>>> Scott: but then yes, what about ofbizbyhotwax and ofbiz_help, etc. less >>>>> confusing I'd say, nor clean. The point is maybe they >>>>> don't appear >>>>> on the official site main page. >>> >>>> I'm not sure I follow, what about them? >>>> The key issue here is that having a unofficial twitter feed appearing as >>>> an official OFBiz resource is unacceptable. >>> >>> From an administrative POV, the name "OFBiz" should not be used, or a >>> disclaimer shown (same for any OFBiz logos used outside of >>> the ASF infra). >> >> I disagree, using the term ofbiz to describe a feed about ofbiz is perfectly >> acceptable. Neither of those feeds make any attempt to >> appear to represent the project or the ASF, not in the Name, Website, Bio or >> through the use of logos. >> > Sorry but I still think that a disclaimer is needed. On the Twitter account > page for instance, maybe not though if there are any > ambiguities, and then when it begins and where it ends... > BTW I don't care much about all that, I just tell the rule I learned for the > demos I provided some times. At this moment I created a specfic logo "Powered > by OFBiz" but I did not find the courage to make a new one since. > > Jacques
You are certainly entitled to your opinion but I still disagree, what you are proposing would essentially mean that any site that mentions the word OFBiz would need to add some sort of disclaimer even though it is quite clear that they are not attempting to represent the project. Regards Scott
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
