On Apr 8, 2010, at 12:57 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > Considering we have yet to do an official release after 3.5 years and the > lack of user interest in our release branches (partly because we recommend > the trunk to everybody), I think it would be a waste of time and effort to > create more than one release branch per year.
This would be part of a change in our release strategy to be more in line with what ASF likes, but we don't have to discuss this now; whenever I (or anyone else of course) will think that it is a good time for a release then we will discuss the specific situation and the vote will tell what is the general consensus about it; I don't think that it is important to discuss this in general now. Jacopo > > If we want the security branch in there then lets wait, there is no good > reason for us to release this month, it's just an arbitrary date. > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > > On 7/04/2010, at 12:07 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >> I would suggest to: >> 1) release 10.04 before the merge is done >> 2) merge the code to the trunk, switch to it, fix any possible issue >> 3) do another release (10.06?) >> >> I know this is not inline with what we currently think a release should be, >> but this is very inline with what the ASF practices and so I will continue >> to insist with the release-often practice. :-) >> >> Jacopo >> >> On Apr 4, 2010, at 8:21 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >> >>> I would like to start bringing parts of the executioncontext20091231 branch >>> into the trunk before we create the next release branch. The implementation >>> of the new security design is not finished, but it will be disabled - so >>> everything will still work the same. >>> >>> My goal is to allow users of the 10.x release to plan for the forthcoming >>> changes, and maybe have the conversion to the new design completed by the >>> release that follows 10.x. >>> >>> I will wait a few days, and if there are no objections I will begin merging >>> the design into the trunk. >>> >>> -Adrian >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >