Adrian Crum wrote: > Those are user issues, not software issues. I agree with Adam - this > behavior has always existed, and changing it now will cause more > problems than it fixes.
To be fair, I hear everyone's points. However, the right way to do this, is to *not* change existing functionality. You add a new command, change all doco to use the new command, then issue a deprecation/warning on the old command. This is no different than altering an api. > > -Adrian > > chris snow wrote: >> Based on my experiences the current run-install is dangerous. It is the >> first target an inexperienced user will run. If this is done on an >> internet >> host, the host can easily be rooted by an attacker if the default >> passwords >> are not changed. >> >> On 20 Apr 2010 17:55, "Adam Heath" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> chris snow wrote: >>> Yes please! >>> >>> On 20 Apr 2010 16:41, "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@ho... >> run-install, with no readers specified, has always installed *all* >> data. Don't change it. >> >> The list of data segments that are installed when none are explicitly >> requested is defined in entityengine.xml, with the >> <entity-data-reader> elements. >> >> An install of ofbiz may explicitly always specify the readers on the >> command line, or may have editted entityengine.xml, and removed the >> items that they are not interested. >>
