For now we can create new target and can keep old as it is. And as the
time passes we can recommend the use of ant run-install-demo instead
of ant run-install.

After certain duration, lets say after 6 month or one year we can
deprecate the use of ant run-install from the system.

I think we can start *VOTE* on this.
Thoughts?

--
Ashish

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya
<[email protected]> wrote:
> +1.
>
> --
> Ashish
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Raj Saini <[email protected]> wrote:
>> In my opinion run-install is misleading as it really does not tell that it
>> is going to install demo data and cause confusion to new users as it has
>> happened with me in the past. For the benefit of old and new users, I
>> suggest to add new command run-install-demo and leave the run-install as it
>> is for a while and document them to tell what exactly they do. There are
>> numerous examples of this in the Linux/Unix world.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Raj
>>
>> On 21/04/10 09:39, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:15 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is just *your* opinion and I respect it (even if comparing this to
>>>>> altering an api is ridiculous)... but please quit with the "teacher/guru"
>>>>> mode...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why is it ridiculous to think of shell script parameters as an API? You
>>>> would surely be surprised if "ls" became "rm" one day, as an extreme but
>>>> valid example.
>>>>
>>>
>>> As a new user of the "OFBiz Linux OS" I would be also very surprised if
>>> the "rm" command really was a "rm -r" command; in my opinion this is worth
>>> of a change, even if old users would have to read one line of documentation
>>> to learn the change.
>>> But really, it is not very important, I am more than happy to leave things
>>> as is because I understand that this could be annoying for old users and
>>> frankly speaking I don't have time and energy to further discuss this.
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think we can safely regard shell scripts as a class of
>>>> program.
>>>>
>>>> Regarding "run-install", we've set an expectation that run-install will
>>>> give you a demo system and that could throw people off. Changing it
>>>> doesn't seem hazardous but I'm not clear that it adds value.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ean Schuessler, CTO
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> 214-720-0700 x 315
>>>> Brainfood, Inc.
>>>> http://www.brainfood.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to