On Apr 20, 2010, at 9:05 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > Adrian Crum wrote: >> Those are user issues, not software issues. I agree with Adam - this >> behavior has always existed, and changing it now will cause more >> problems than it fixes. > > To be fair, I hear everyone's points. However, the right way to do > this, is to *not* change existing functionality.
This is just *your* opinion and I respect it (even if comparing this to altering an api is ridiculous)... but please quit with the "teacher/guru" mode... Jacopo > You add a new > command, change all doco to use the new command, then issue a > deprecation/warning on the old command. This is no different than > altering an api. > >> >> -Adrian >> >> chris snow wrote: >>> Based on my experiences the current run-install is dangerous. It is the >>> first target an inexperienced user will run. If this is done on an >>> internet >>> host, the host can easily be rooted by an attacker if the default >>> passwords >>> are not changed. >>> >>> On 20 Apr 2010 17:55, "Adam Heath" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> chris snow wrote: >>>> Yes please! >>>> >>>> On 20 Apr 2010 16:41, "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@ho... >>> run-install, with no readers specified, has always installed *all* >>> data. Don't change it. >>> >>> The list of data segments that are installed when none are explicitly >>> requested is defined in entityengine.xml, with the >>> <entity-data-reader> elements. >>> >>> An install of ofbiz may explicitly always specify the readers on the >>> command line, or may have editted entityengine.xml, and removed the >>> items that they are not interested. >>> >
