if I read this correct then any commit requires a vote of the PMC?
that would certainly increase communications, which I am all in favor of.
Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/10/2010 10:56 AM:
On Jul 8, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
2. You're not the first to mention it but I don't know where this idea of a
veto came from, it doesn't exist. When required, the PMC as a group can make
binding decisions but not individuals.
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Specifically:
"Votes on Code Modification
For code-modification votes, +1 votes are in favour of the proposal, but -1
votes are vetos and kill the proposal dead until all vetoers withdraw their -1
votes.
Unless a vote has been declared as using lazy consensus, three +1 votes are required
for a code-modification proposal to pass."
And you are correct, binding votes are the ones of PMC members.
Kind regards,
Jacopo
