apologize meant
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus
and I like to see this thought it would really slow things down
http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ReviewThenCommit
BJ Freeman sent the following on 7/10/2010 11:37 AM:
so votes in a jira are PMC only?
and if no votes is the lazy consensus
http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#Lazy
do all commits require the lazy consensus in the mailing list before?
Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 7/10/2010 10:56 AM:
On Jul 8, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
2. You're not the first to mention it but I don't know where this
idea of a veto came from, it doesn't exist. When required, the PMC as
a group can make binding decisions but not individuals.
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Specifically:
"Votes on Code Modification
For code-modification votes, +1 votes are in favour of the proposal,
but -1 votes are vetos and kill the proposal dead until all vetoers
withdraw their -1 votes.
Unless a vote has been declared as using lazy consensus, three +1
votes are required for a code-modification proposal to pass."
And you are correct, binding votes are the ones of PMC members.
Kind regards,
Jacopo
