And also why not using the standard jQuery structure with plugins in Framework?

Thanks

Jacques

Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I have still a pure OFBiz concern tough:
I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 
1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking
for us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js
 is v1.3.2.

So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with 
it for imagemanagement

Why not using the one in Framework?

Jacques

Hans Bakker wrote:
Hi Jaques,

although not shown in the js file (the author will update it)

the license is MIT:

http://code.google.com/p/jqueryrotate/

Regards,
Hans

On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:57 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
OK, I will have to revert this commit (it's our duty), unless someone take care 
of the GPL issues...

Thanks

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
Bump...!

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
Hans,

Could you please check that removing 
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js
 lets the
feature to continue to work?

Jacopo:
jCrop is MIT licenced http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop_License.html, a 
simple note in NOTICE is enough
jquery.form.js is dual licensed as jQuery (GPL and MIT), a simple note in 
NOTICE is enough:
http://jquery.malsup.com/license.html jquery.function.js should be licensed by 
us (it's obviously a covert)

But jquery.Rotate.js is a real issue: LGPL 
http://code.google.com/p/jquery-rotate/ and should not be commited in our repo

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
I did not notice, this is messy. We already have jQuery 1.4.2 (we have also 
1.4.3 and 1.4.4 but they are buggy and blocking
for us) in framework/images so we don't need an older jQuery
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js
 is v1.3.2.

So imagemanagement should rather use jQuery 1.4.2 unless they are issues with 
it for imagemanagement  (I doubt)

I'd strongly recommend for any new jQuery stuff to follow the path we used so 
far (have all centralized in framework/images)


Also I can't connect to http://deepliquid.com/content/Jcrop.html (actually I 
get a blank screen)

And... I'm tired... :/

Jacques

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>
Should the following files without a license header be mentioned in the LICENSE 
file?

Jacopo

ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.css
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.js
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Jcrop.min.js
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.Rotate.js
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.form.js
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.function.js
ofbiz-trunk/applications/product/webapp/catalog/imagemanagement/js/jquery.min.js


Reply via email to