+1 These new ones really make sense. IMO we don't need to keep the old ones.
Regards Vikas On Mar 26, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Hi all, > > I have reviewed the names of our ant tasks and I would like to propose to > rename [*] some of them to make them more consistent with what they actually > do. > In short, I would like to: > * rename some "run" tasks with the word "start" because they actually start > OFBiz > * rename "run-install*" tasks with the word "load" because they actually load > data > ** rename the task that loads demo data from "run-install" to a more explicit > "load-demo" > > Here is the complete list of proposed changes: > > run --> start > run-debug --> start-debug > run-pos --> start-pos > run-install --> load-demo > run-install-* targets --> load-* (for example: run-install-seed --> load-seed > etc...) > > What do you think? > > Jacopo > > [*] if we are worried about "backward compatibility" (even if this is not > actually a *compatibility* issue) we could keep the old ones (to call the new > ones); I personally don't think it is necessary and we could clean them to > have a cleaner build.xml file for future evolution.... but I would not be > against keeping the old ones as well if there is enough consensus. >
