+0
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Op 26 maart 2012 20:05 schreef Bruno Busco <bruno.bu...@gmail.com> het > volgende: > >> +1 >> >> 2012/3/26 Ashish Vijaywargiya <vijaywargiya.ash...@gmail.com> >> >> > +1 for the proposal. >> > >> > -- >> > Ashish >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < >> > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > I have reviewed the names of our ant tasks and I would like to propose >> to >> > > rename [*] some of them to make them more consistent with what they >> > > actually do. >> > > In short, I would like to: >> > > * rename some "run" tasks with the word "start" because they actually >> > > start OFBiz >> > > * rename "run-install*" tasks with the word "load" because they >> actually >> > > load data >> > > ** rename the task that loads demo data from "run-install" to a more >> > > explicit "load-demo" >> > > >> > > Here is the complete list of proposed changes: >> > > >> > > run --> start >> > > run-debug --> start-debug >> > > run-pos --> start-pos >> > > run-install --> load-demo >> > > run-install-* targets --> load-* (for example: run-install-seed --> >> > > load-seed etc...) >> > > >> > > What do you think? >> > > >> > > Jacopo >> > > >> > > [*] if we are worried about "backward compatibility" (even if this is >> not >> > > actually a *compatibility* issue) we could keep the old ones (to call >> the >> > > new ones); I personally don't think it is necessary and we could clean >> > them >> > > to have a cleaner build.xml file for future evolution.... but I would >> not >> > > be against keeping the old ones as well if there is enough consensus. >> > > >> > > >> > >>
