+1 Op 26 maart 2012 20:05 schreef Bruno Busco <bruno.bu...@gmail.com> het volgende:
> +1 > > 2012/3/26 Ashish Vijaywargiya <vijaywargiya.ash...@gmail.com> > > > +1 for the proposal. > > > > -- > > Ashish > > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have reviewed the names of our ant tasks and I would like to propose > to > > > rename [*] some of them to make them more consistent with what they > > > actually do. > > > In short, I would like to: > > > * rename some "run" tasks with the word "start" because they actually > > > start OFBiz > > > * rename "run-install*" tasks with the word "load" because they > actually > > > load data > > > ** rename the task that loads demo data from "run-install" to a more > > > explicit "load-demo" > > > > > > Here is the complete list of proposed changes: > > > > > > run --> start > > > run-debug --> start-debug > > > run-pos --> start-pos > > > run-install --> load-demo > > > run-install-* targets --> load-* (for example: run-install-seed --> > > > load-seed etc...) > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Jacopo > > > > > > [*] if we are worried about "backward compatibility" (even if this is > not > > > actually a *compatibility* issue) we could keep the old ones (to call > the > > > new ones); I personally don't think it is necessary and we could clean > > them > > > to have a cleaner build.xml file for future evolution.... but I would > not > > > be against keeping the old ones as well if there is enough consensus. > > > > > > > > >
