I've never understood the use case for it so a general +0 but if no one else knows either then +1
Regards Scott On 28/04/2012, at 11:23 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > While working on the Mini-language overhaul, I noticed that the error message > handling is a little convoluted and it opens up the potential for things to > not work properly. > > You can specify the name of the error message list in the <simple-method> > element. You can also specify the name of the error message list in some of > the method operations that generate error messages. I am not sure what > purpose that serves. The event and service engines will retrieve the error > message list specified in the <simple-method> element - any other error > message lists that were created by method operations are ignored. > > In the existing Mini-language code there are only a handful of method > operations that specify the error message list name, and in all of those > cases the default name is used - effectively doing nothing. I would like to > remove the capability to specify the error message list name in all of the > method operations. Instead, method operations that generate errors will use > the error message list name defined in the enclosing <simple-method> element. > > What do you think? > > -Adrian >
