What tests are failing. Regards,
Pierre Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad Op 28 apr. 2012 om 20:16 heeft Adrian Crum <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > The interesting side effect of this change is it causes tests to fail - > because errors were being ignored, so the tests passed. > > -Adrian > > On 4/28/2012 12:23 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >> While working on the Mini-language overhaul, I noticed that the error >> message handling is a little convoluted and it opens up the potential for >> things to not work properly. >> >> You can specify the name of the error message list in the <simple-method> >> element. You can also specify the name of the error message list in some of >> the method operations that generate error messages. I am not sure what >> purpose that serves. The event and service engines will retrieve the error >> message list specified in the <simple-method> element - any other error >> message lists that were created by method operations are ignored. >> >> In the existing Mini-language code there are only a handful of method >> operations that specify the error message list name, and in all of those >> cases the default name is used - effectively doing nothing. I would like to >> remove the capability to specify the error message list name in all of the >> method operations. Instead, method operations that generate errors will use >> the error message list name defined in the enclosing <simple-method> element. >> >> What do you think? >> >> -Adrian >>
