Indeed, pretty useless OOTB
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>
Search for "error-list-name"
-Adrian
On 4/28/2012 6:55 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
+1 to remove if really "it opens up the potential for things to not
work properly."
And of course unless the creator of this option explains the need
Also what attributes will be removed exactly?
Note: I did not find any "error-message" string in *.xml files in trunk
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>
While working on the Mini-language overhaul, I noticed that the error
message handling is a little convoluted and it opens up the potential
for things to not work properly.
You can specify the name of the error message list in the
<simple-method> element. You can also specify the name of the error
message list in some of the method operations that generate error
messages. I am not sure what purpose that serves. The event and
service engines will retrieve the error message list specified in the
<simple-method> element - any other error message lists that were
created by method operations are ignored.
In the existing Mini-language code there are only a handful of method
operations that specify the error message list name, and in all of
those cases the default name is used - effectively doing nothing. I
would like to remove the capability to specify the error message list
name in all of the method operations. Instead, method operations that
generate errors will use the error message list name defined in the
enclosing <simple-method> element.
What do you think?
-Adrian