Actually, the tests are fine. I was under the impression that the
<add-error> and <check-errors> elements were related. I thought the
<check-errors> element checked the error list created by <add-error>,
but the two are not related.
-Adrian
On 4/28/2012 8:05 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
What tests are failing.
Regards,
Pierre
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 28 apr. 2012 om 20:16 heeft Adrian Crum<[email protected]>
het volgende geschreven:
The interesting side effect of this change is it causes tests to fail - because
errors were being ignored, so the tests passed.
-Adrian
On 4/28/2012 12:23 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
While working on the Mini-language overhaul, I noticed that the error message
handling is a little convoluted and it opens up the potential for things to not
work properly.
You can specify the name of the error message list in the<simple-method> element.
You can also specify the name of the error message list in some of the method operations
that generate error messages. I am not sure what purpose that serves. The event and service
engines will retrieve the error message list specified in the<simple-method> element
- any other error message lists that were created by method operations are ignored.
In the existing Mini-language code there are only a handful of method operations that
specify the error message list name, and in all of those cases the default name is
used - effectively doing nothing. I would like to remove the capability to specify
the error message list name in all of the method operations. Instead, method
operations that generate errors will use the error message list name defined in the
enclosing<simple-method> element.
What do you think?
-Adrian
