Right, so they recommend using 301 for a permanent redirect but like I said, 
the bulk of our redirects (as far as I am aware) are used for Post Redirects 
which 301 isn't appropriate for.

Regards
Scott

On 26/06/2012, at 2:15 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=93633
> http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=40132
> http://searchengineland.com/images/301-302-explained.gif
> 
> HTH
> 
> Jacques
> 
> From: "Scott Gray" <scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>> I think most of our redirects OOTB are used as a Post/Redirect/Get pattern 
>> for which 303 is best on HTTP 1.1 or 302 on HTTP 1.0
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post/Redirect/Get
>> 
>> Do you have a reference for your SEO best practices? Or alternatively do you 
>> have an example of where a 301 redirect would be more appropriate in the 
>> ecommerce app?
>> 
>> Regards
>> Scott
>> 
>> On 25/06/2012, at 8:07 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> 
>>> This is the easiest way to go, so I'm not against, no other opinions?
>>> 
>>> Jacques
>>> 
>>> From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>
>>>> A 301 permanent replacement makes sense to me.
>>>> -Adrian
>>>> On 6/22/2012 8:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Since all redirect response types (url, cross-redirect, request-redirect, 
>>>>> request-redirect-noparam) call HttpServletResponse.sendRedirect() through 
>>>>> RequestHandler.callRedirect(), all controllers redirections do 302 
>>>>> redirections.
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes#3xx_Redirection
>>>>> 
>>>>> To keep short:
>>>>> 301: permanent redirect
>>>>> 302: temporary redirect
>>>>> 
>>>>> SEO best practices recommend to use 301 instead of 302 (just Google for 
>>>>> "301 vs 302")
>>>>> Of course this does not matter much for an ERP only used in an intranet, 
>>>>> but for eCommerce it matters.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So we have 3 solutions at hand:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1. Keep as is (ie continue with a 302 redirect)
>>>>> 2. Permanently replace the 302 redirect by a 301
>>>>> 3. Offer an option between the 2 (or even others if we want, like 307).
>>>>> 
>>>>> If we choice 3, what name would you pick for this option 
>>>>> ("redirect-type", between {"301","302"}?). Then it would not have any 
>>>>> sense for non redirect response types, maybe a reason to prefer option 2. 
>>>>> Though a temporary redirect could still be useful in case of redirection 
>>>>> on error, hence my preference for 3...
>>>>> 
>>>>> What's your opinion?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jacques
>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to