Hi, Jonatan wants to give it a go and begin this weekend.
So I created the frontendNewTheme2013-05-10 branch for that, if anybody complains it's always possible to drop it but I see no reasons. For convenience here is the branch creation commit comment Following the thread "Converting frontend themes to Twitter Bootstrap" here is a new branch for that. Actually the thread subject was misleading since we agreed that Twitter Bootstrap is not the only solution. The idea is though to introduce and use a HTML5/CSS framework, Bootstrap, H5Boilerplate and Zurb Foundation will be tried in the process... So I changed the thread subject to Converting frontend themes using HTML5/CSS framework/s. Jacques From: "Atul Vani" <[email protected]> > Comments inline. > > On Tue, 07 May 2013 21:02:21 +0530, Adrian Crum > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I understand what you are proposing. So, let me try this again... >> >> HTML cleanups are fine. Updating the markup to HTML 5 is fine. That sort >> of overhaul has been done before and it is always welcome. >> >> What we are discussing here is introducing an outside styling framework >> for the eCommerce application. I question the need for the framework >> because most businesses don't use the eCommerce application out of the >> box. In other words, we would be investing a lot of time and effort into >> something that a lot of businesses will just throw away. >> >> As Christian pointed out, it would be nice to have a better looking >> eCommerce demonstration, and I agree. But again, I think that can be >> done with consistent and concise markup - coupled with some good styling. > > It can be. But the framework helps in defining "consistent and concise > markup". Why reinvent? > >> >> I'm not opposed to the external framework idea, I just question the need >> for it. >> >> -Adrian >> >> On 5/7/2013 4:21 PM, Jonatan Soto wrote: >>> Hi Adrian, >>> >>> Thanks a lot for your input. >>> >>> I agree with you that OFBiz is not an eCommerce platform and also that >>> the >>> current themes are there for demonstration but that doesn't change the >>> fact >>> that it needs a complete rework. So what I'm referring to is more about >>> to >>> adapt all of the ftls and screen definitions using one of the fancy >>> HTML5 >>> frameworks available rather a cleanup. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Adrian Crum < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree in principle with this reply. Very few shops use the OFBiz >>>> eCommerce front-end - it wasn't intended to be used as-is, instead its >>>> there for demonstration purposes. >>>> >>>> Each business will have a preference for styling their site, so >>>> choosing >>>> one theme over all others seems presumptuous. >>>> >>>> As I mentioned in the Jira issue, HTML cleanups are always welcome. >>>> Consistent and concise markup makes it easier to design themes - and >>>> from >>>> my perspective that provides the most benefit to OFBiz developers. >>>> >>>> -Adrian >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5/7/2013 2:49 PM, Richard Siddall wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jonatan Soto wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Would be anyone interested in convert the existing frontend themes >>>>>> into >>>>>> Bootstrap >>>>>> http://twitter.github.io/**bootstrap/<http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/> >>>>>> ? >>>>>> >>>>>> The idea is to create a theme from scratch that will replace the >>>>>> current >>>>>> default and multiplex themes. >>>>>> >>>>> [snip] >>>>> >>>>> While I think having more modern front-end themes would be great, let >>>>> me >>>>> play devil's advocate... >>>>> >>>>> Why Bootstrap? >>>>> >>>>> Why not Zurb Foundation (http://foundation.zurb.com/), HTML5 >>>>> Boilerplate >>>>> (http://html5boilerplate.com/) or some other starting point? Or as >>>>> Scott Kellum argued on the Compass list (on January 8), use a >>>>> combination >>>>> of components such as Susy, Sassy-buttons, Color-Schemer, and >>>>> Modular-Scale. >>>>> >>>>> Bootstrap is an easy way of getting a lot of functionality, but it's >>>>> arguable overused. It's fast becoming to HTML5 frameworks what Times >>>>> Roman >>>>> is to web fonts. If you want your web shop to look like everyone >>>>> else's >>>>> web shop, it's a great choice. If you want to differentiate yourself >>>>> in >>>>> the market, use something else. >>>>> >>>>> Plus, many Bootstrap-based themes just throw the whole bloated >>>>> framework >>>>> at the browser, regardless of which pieces they use, slowing page >>>>> loads and >>>>> wasting mobile bandwidth allocations. But Bootstrap is built on >>>>> LESS, so >>>>> you can choose which chunks of CSS and JavaScript should be included >>>>> in >>>>> your site's copy of Bootstrap, as well as using variables and mixins >>>>> to get >>>>> more consistent CSS styling. >>>>> >>>>> LESS is based on JavaScript, which practically requires you to install >>>>> Node.js to use it. Zurb Foundation is based on SASS, which is >>>>> written in >>>>> Ruby. It looks like SASS will run on JRuby on the JVM. >>>>> >>>>> To summarize: >>>>> - Bootstrap is just one of several great HTML5 frameworks >>>>> - You can get the same effects using straight CSS3 and JavaScript, or >>>>> smaller projects for areas like responsive design, button styling, >>>>> text >>>>> spacing, etc. >>>>> - Bootstrap is overused >>>>> - Bootstrap is frequently ineptly used, penalizing the end user >>>>> - A major reason to use Bootstrap is to use LESS and other languages >>>>> that >>>>> abstract CSS and JavaScript >>>>> - Bootstrap may not be the best framework for a Java-based project >>>>> >>>>> I hope this helps. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Richard Siddall >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
