ok, got it, thanks.

Jacopo

On Feb 20, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Adrian Crum <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> 
wrote:

> 4) Implement auto-vivify using Tomcat EL.
> 
> Otherwise, correct on all points.
> 
> Adrian Crum
> Sandglass Software
> www.sandglass-software.com
> 
> On 2/20/2014 7:25 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> On Feb 20, 2014, at 3:51 PM, Adrian Crum 
>> <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I tried not to make the project dependent on JUEL. I created a facade class 
>>> that connects OFBiz to JUEL through the standard EL API. Most likely the 
>>> change you propose only requires changing some imports and a few tweaks.
>> 
>> We are talking about JuelConnector class, right?
>> 
>>> 
>>> One of the reasons I chose JUEL was its performance - it is very fast.
>> 
>> What roadmap would you recommend to migrate to EL 2.2? I guess something 
>> like:
>> 
>> 1) remove juel-2.2.1.jar (containing de.odysseus.el.* with EL 2.1)
>> 2) add el-api-2.2.jar (javax.el.*) and jasper-el.jar (from tomcat)
>> 3) fix the imports and errors in JuelConnector.java
>> 
>> Does it make sense?
>> 
>> Jacopo
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Adrian Crum
>>> Sandglass Software
>>> www.sandglass-software.com
>>> 
>>> On 2/20/2014 12:34 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>> I need some help to understand the current status of the EL integration in 
>>>> OFBiz.
>>>> The latest bug-fix release of Tomcat contains the implementation of the EL 
>>>> specification at version 2.2.
>>>> However OFBiz currently has a jar that implements the EL spec 2.1 and also 
>>>> some extensions to the specification from de.odysseus: I know we have some 
>>>> OFBiz code that is using this extensions.
>>>> Are we stuck to this version of the spec? Is there a way we can resolve 
>>>> this dependency? My preference would be to use the stuff bundled with 
>>>> Tomcat.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Jacopo
>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to