My answer was
>What I mean is I don't see how and why (re-)adding error.log in log4j2.xml
will make it messy
I just added a point about performance issue because I knew it would be the next argument on the table. Adding few lines in log4j2.xml does not stand
as an argument to me.
Jacques
Le 09/09/2014 10:55, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Jacques,
you are clearly not reading what I and others wrote.
Jacopo
On Sep 9, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
wrote:
Le 09/09/2014 10:12, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Sep 9, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
wrote:
I understand you want to keep things as clean as possible, but are we not going
too far in our slimdown crusade?
This is ridiculous, Jacques. This is not about the slimdown (crusade?), this
ended up months ago. This is all about writing and maintaining good,
well-crafted artifacts and code. The current OFBiz trunk is still a great mess
and I am surprised (and a bit concerned) that you think we are going too far in
the attempt to keep things clean.
What I mean is I don't see how and why (re-)adding error.log in log4j2.xml will
make it messy, really are we not splitting hairs here?
If you told me, "this will slow down and the system" or something like that I
could understand. But I explained why it should not, except if you have an extremely big
issue and then this big issue would be your concern, not the error.log which would only
be the symptom.
Jacopo
