Maybe you could file a bug issue regarding that?

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:

>
> On Mar 25, 2015, at 10:55 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>
> > Can we say that the Birt reports are better? Do they always work (I got
> some issues there)
>
> No, I wouldn't say that (of course you are free to think otherwise, it is
> just the *we* part that I disagree with).
>
> >
> > Also just tried
> http://demo-stable-ofbiz.apache.org/accounting/control/FinancialSummaryReportOptions?organizationPartyId=Company
> where Birt is not and all reports fail, normal?
>
> I am not sure I understand... I got the same errors with or without Birt:
> the request maps are not defined; I don't see how this bug fits into this
> conversation.
> But for example, the balance sheet report:
>
> https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/BalanceSheet?organizationPartyId=Company
> is not a Birt report and works well; however the if you click on the
> "Export as pdf" button you get an error when Birt is active while it works
> when Birt is inactive.
>
> Jacopo
>
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > Le 24/03/2015 16:36, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> >> The accounting component has financial reports implemented as screen
> widgets (html/pdf/csv) that the Birt component overrides with different
> ones implemented with Birt.
> >> This is actually one example about a specialpurpose component that is
> overriding/hiding functionality that is already provided by the
> applications with a different one: you can't see them when Birt is enabled.
> >>
> >> Jacopo
> >>
> >> On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Don't we also have dependencies on birt? Regarding reporting in
> accounting
> >>> and order?
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>> Pierre Smits
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to