As far as I can see it, this whole discussion regarding GIT vs SVN (move to GIT), is dependent on and blocked by the perceptions of (and viewpoints on) the (in)clarity surrounding how we (as the contributing community) deal with code-changing contributions (CTR vs RTC/patches vs dumps).
If we don’t deal with that first, I see blockers on the road forward every time we reiterate this GIT vs SVN discussion. Like it there were before and are now. It seems we (all) need a realignment and/or re-acceptance of our G & C (of the GRC) in that area first. Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > On Apr 21, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Adrian Crum < > adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote: > > > Everyone is missing the point I am trying to make. > > > > I said, "***IF*** Jacopo said something like..." > > > > As the OFBiz RM, ***IF*** Jacopo said he couldn't use Subversion to > manage the OFBiz project, then the need to switch to something else would > be obvious. > > > > I hope that clarifies my true meaning. > > > > Adrian Crum > > It was clear to me since your first message but I have replied to Jacques > as I was starting to feel dragged (or, in the context of git, I should say > "pulled") into the mix :-) > > Jacopo > >
