On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Sharan,
>
> I guess all accepted proposals can now be transformed into JIRA issues, for
> follow-up and tracking purposes.
>
> Also, with respect to the failing components) I suggest that we postpone
> the ultimate decision of activation/deactivation until the moment of
> cutting a release. Until then, contributors can work on those issues, and
> if they can't resolve the issues by the time the decision needs to be taken
> we know what to deactivate precisely.
>

I suggest the opposite :-) if we disable them sooner than later
contributors will be more aware of the work required and there be less
surprises when they will be excluded from releases; disabling them sooner
would probably increase the chances of fixing them because it will catch
attention; if otherwise no one will care about them being disabled it could
be an indicator that there is not enough interest.

Jacopo



> Best regards,
>
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Sharan Foga <sharan.f...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone
> >
> > Thanks responding to these 3 proposals. Based on your feedback and
> > comments we can move ahead with 2 of these for the changes to the
> directory
> > structure for java and the renaming of specialpurpose to 'plugins'
> >
> > For the third, Pierre highlighted that he was against this proposal so we
> > won't be deactivating the all the specialpurpose components by default.
> >
> > However as mentioned previously, we are having library migration problems
> > with some of the components so we can only activate the ones that don't
> > have any issues; the others will not be activated and will need
> additional
> > work to manage the changeover to remote libraries and the resolution of
> any
> > startup conflicts.
> >
> > (Just for information the components with issues are BIRT, Ebaystore,
> > ldap, POS and cmssite.)
> >
> > We are also looking for help with these migrations so if you would like
> to
> > help out fixing the issues with these specialpurpose components then
> please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sharan
> >
> > On 2016-07-11 17:56 (+0200), Sharan-F <sharan.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Everyone
> > >
> > > Another update on the task list for moving forward with Gradle and the
> > > Trunk. We would also like to get community feedback and comments on
> each
> > of
> > > the following 3 proposals:
> > >
> > > Task 1 “Replace all the current jars in OFBiz with appropriate remote
> > > libraries from a download repository
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > The work to replace the jars is ongoing and we have already removed 169
> > of
> > > them. These libraries will now be automatically downloaded by Gradle.
> > Work
> > > will continue to remove the remaining files. As we are working through,
> > we
> > > are finding library migration issues with some of the specialpurpose
> > > components so would like *to propose to deactivate all specialpurpose
> > > components by default.*
> > >
> > >
> > > Task 4. “ Move all java source files to\u2002$component/src/main/java
> and
> > > introduce all unit tests in\u2002\u2002$component/src/test/java”
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Another area we need to progress is the re-design and changing of the
> > > directory structure so that we can separate the Java files between main
> > and
> > > test. This will help us simplify the implementation of a testing
> > framework.
> > > *The proposal for the directory structure is as follows:
> > >
> > >    componentname/src/main/java
> > >    componentname/src/test/java*
> > >
> > >
> > > Task 10. “Propose the renaming specialpurpose to plugins or such an
> > > appropriate name for clarity”
> > >
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > We would like * to propose changing the name of the specialpurpose
> > folder to
> > > 'plugins'*
> > >
> > > These are the 3 areas we would like to progress so please feel free to
> > > respond with your feedback and comments.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Sharan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> >
> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Proposed-Task-List-for-Moving-Forward-with-Gradle-and-the-Trunk-tp4687808p4688257.html
> > > Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to