Le 15/07/2016 à 16:12, Pierre Smits a écrit :
1) Highlight Parked / On Hold Jiras
>We have quite a few Jira issues that are 'parked' or 'on hold' – so it
>would be good if these were clearly identified so that if people come
>across them they know that they are not being worked on (and the reason).
>
>We could look at adding a new status, a flag or a label that could hold
>this information.
>
Not all bugs are equally important. That is why we have the Priority field,
with a limited set of choices. But there is a difference in impact. A bug
might be of a technical nature, which is easy to prove with an error
report. Or it might be of a business nature: it works fine technically, but
is unacceptable in a particular business domain due to GRC policies and
procedures. I refer to OFBIZ-7796
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7796>, OFBIZ-7767
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7767> and OFBIZ-7783
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7783> as examples. Some will
call these improvements as well, but these kinds of issues put a serious
barrier regarding adoptability.
So my suggestion is to be able to classify better: e.g. add 'business' and
'techinal' as choices to the mix.
How would you do that in Jira?
Jacques
