Hi Jacques,

No I did not try to clear the caches, but that is a good point, perhaps
clearing would work. I'll try that next.

Taher Alkhateeb

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:

> Hi Taher,
>
> I currently work in debug mode and I indeed get
> java.io.FileNotFoundException for:
>
> .gradle\caches\modules-2\files-2.1\edu.ucar\netcdf4\4.5.5\67
> 5d63ecc857c50dd50858011b670160aa30b62\jcl-over-slf4j-1.7.7.jar
> .gradle\caches\modules-2\files-2.1\edu.ucar\netcdf4\4.5.5\67
> 5d63ecc857c50dd50858011b670160aa30b62\ehcache-core-2.6.2.jar
>
> several times (3 each IIRW)
>
> But only those files are concerned. I thought it was only a matter of
> clearing Gradle caches to update there. I did not try because it's just
> annoying and reloading Internet again is even more. Did you try to clean
> the caches?
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
> Le 28/10/2016 à 11:45, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
>
>> Hi Jacopo,
>>
>> I have discovered a regression that I introduced in r1765127. If you run
>> OFBiz in debug mode it will throw a "FileNotFoundException". This happens
>> when the ContainerLoader calls the init method of the CatalinaContainer.
>> I'm not yet exactly sure why, and at worst case scenario I might have to
>> revert the entire commit (it's a big 2000 lines unfortunately). So I will
>> do my best in the few coming days to try and debug the root cause. It
>> could
>> be the class loader but I'm just not sure, the old code was so messy it's
>> hard to pinpoint the root cause.
>>
>> I'll keep you posted but please don't release before we take a decision on
>> this regression. Anyone willing to help is more than welcome to pitch in.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
>> jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Jacques, I agree that delaying of 1-2 weeks would not be a big
>>> deal.
>>> If anyone is planning to contribute improvements in the next 1-2 weeks
>>> then
>>> please speak up and we could definitely wait for them.
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jacopo, All.
>>>>
>>>> Are there no major improvements that we would wish to have before
>>>> cutting
>>>> the branch?
>>>>
>>>> I personally don't remember any. But with the 6 last months turmoil we
>>>> increased from around 0 issues created vs resolved to 1840 created and
>>>>
>>> 1447
>>>
>>>> resolved.
>>>> So we have now a differential of around 400 issues pending for
>>>>
>>> resolution.
>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?
>>>>
>>> selectPageId=12310800
>>>
>>>> I know that most of them are minor subtasks, and it's hard to follow the
>>>> flow.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway if you wait for an improvement it's the moment to raise a hand
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 24/10/2016 à 10:40, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Ok, it is probably time to proceed with this plan:
>>>>> 1) create a new release branch named "release16.10"
>>>>> 2) the target goal could be that of issuing a release out of it
>>>>> sometime
>>>>> in
>>>>> the next month ("Apache OFBiz 16.10.01")
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <
>>>>> slidingfilame...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Sharan Foga <sharan.f...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's great news !  +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Sharan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 07/09/16 12:06, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it is the right time to create a new release branch out of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the
>>>
>>>> trunk.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> According to our naming conventions the release will be named
>>>>>>>> "release16.09".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any objections or concerns? If not, I will create the branch later
>>>>>>>> today/tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> After that we will start, in a separate thread, the discussion about
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> preparation of our first release out of this branch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>

Reply via email to