Right, looks like it doesn't have entire features covered from the demo page I saw. But yes on similar tracks we can build something really good to go.
Thanks Gaurav On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > You talking about something like > > - [1], which is bootstrap based and intended for customer facing apps > (e.g. cmssite and ecommerce variants), > - [2], which is current default ecommerce theme elements disentangled > from the framework stack > > ? > > [1] https://github.com/ORRTIZ/ecbootstrap > [2] https://github.com/ORRTIZ/ecdefault > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Gaurav Saini <gauravsain...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > Looks like I am jumping a bit late here. But as Julien said I am really > > interested on working on the UI side of the project. I am still looking > > deep into the ofbiz structure and understand how Julien is proposing to > do > > UI customisation so I can help and make OFBiz look good :) > > > > For starting what I am able to understand and quickly start is prepare a > > theme for the e-commerce component that is responsive in nature and with > > good UI/UX components. So, anyone starting with ofbiz can directly use > the > > theme with minor changes according to need. > > > > Just to mention, I have updated my angular code to github which i > presented > > in presentation at ApacheCON. I have already posting link on hipchat, if > > somebody interested can look into it. I was interested in using angular > as > > all together different single page app outside ofbiz because it helped me > > do good amount of UI customisation and on the other hand for small > modules > > or some specific requirement it was really light-weight to use at > client's > > end. > > https://github.com/gauravsaini03/ofbiz-angular > > > > Thanks > > Gaurav > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Julien NICOLAS < > julien.nico...@nereide.fr > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Yes, I agree, let's make it simple for the POC. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 30/11/2016 11:07, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > > > > >> Amazing discussion and initiative. > > >> My only recommendation at the moment is to try to plan very short (in > > >> scope and in time) development cycles (requirements gathering and > > >> discussion, design, implementation, review) so that each cycle could > > focus > > >> on a specific experiment/proposal (e.g. a given ui technology) and > could > > >> deliver a proof of concept to the community (e.g. as a new component) > > for > > >> further discussion and work. > > >> > > >> In this way we will be able to quickly implement and compare different > > >> solutions/technologies and will have a chance to take a more informed > > >> decision. > > >> > > >> Jacopo > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > *Gaurav Saini* > > > -- Regards, *Gaurav Saini*
