+1
I like the work done with the Groovy DSL and i see no drawback using it
compared to java.
Gil
Le 19/05/2017 à 16:20, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
My preference is to migrate to the Groovy DSL, and enhance it if required.
The Groovy DSL is the natural evolution of the core concepts and strengths
of Minilang and is preferable, in my opinion, to plain Java for the
implementation of business logic.
Jacopo
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de>
wrote:
Hi All,
according to the discussion in [1] and the Jira issue [2] we decided to
deprecate mini lang and migrate it to Java and/or Groovy code.
To help contributors finding the right approach for the migration, we
should define which mini lang code should be migrated to Java code, groovy
or some DSL (which has to be further developed).
I'd propose to generally migrate services, events and tests to Java code
to begin with.
There was also a proposal by Paul Foxworthy [3] to have an automatic
conversion between mini lang and groovy DSL. Maybe we can extend this to
generate Java code also?
Any ideas and approach to do this?
Happy to hear your opinions,
best regards,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH
www.ecomify.de
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/253b41060a295b8ab68bc78
763cc129fc74b712cf776f8716022097f@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9350
[3] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6ce592d253c102e50f25f5f
2095dab1e9b7c54e48260b9e6d1cda9e1@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E
