On Jun 23, 2008, at 4:35 PM, David Blevins wrote:
We might want to start thinking release pretty soon here.
Another topic is weather or not we want to call this 3.0.1 or 3.1.
I was just talking to one of the guys from InfoQ about the upcoming
release and he definitely liked some of the new features but sort of
went cold on the idea of a news post wanting to wait till 3.1. Got me
thinking that maybe 3.0.1 isn't such a wise idea if we really want to
get the word out there.
If you look at our changes, they're mostly new features and
improvements with just a few bug fixes. My thoughts previous to
talking with him was that we should reserve 3.1 for a more EJB 3.1
packed release. But really we already have a few great EJB 3.1
features like the embedded testing stuff and ejbs in wars.
Maybe the right answer is just to go for the gusto and call it OpenEJB
3.1 and get people starting to think of us as EJB 3.1.
Thoughts?
-David
