+1 for OpenEJB 3.1
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Daniel S. Haischt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for OpenEJB 3.1 > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:56 AM, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Jun 23, 2008, at 4:35 PM, David Blevins wrote: >>> >>> We might want to start thinking release pretty soon here. >> >> Another topic is weather or not we want to call this 3.0.1 or 3.1. >> >> I was just talking to one of the guys from InfoQ about the upcoming release >> and he definitely liked some of the new features but sort of went cold on >> the idea of a news post wanting to wait till 3.1. Got me thinking that >> maybe 3.0.1 isn't such a wise idea if we really want to get the word out >> there. >> >> If you look at our changes, they're mostly new features and improvements >> with just a few bug fixes. My thoughts previous to talking with him was >> that we should reserve 3.1 for a more EJB 3.1 packed release. But really we >> already have a few great EJB 3.1 features like the embedded testing stuff >> and ejbs in wars. >> >> Maybe the right answer is just to go for the gusto and call it OpenEJB 3.1 >> and get people starting to think of us as EJB 3.1. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -David >> >> >
