On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:56 AM, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe the right answer is just to go for the gusto and call it OpenEJB 3.1 > and get people starting to think of us as EJB 3.1. +1 for OpenEJB 3.1 Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
