Hmm, If people on both projects are the same not sure it makes so much sense...and tomee code is really really small and doesnt do enough work to let it be another project IMO (in fact it only does integration so fixes are mainly in openejb)
Wdyt? Le 13 nov. 2012 23:45, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit : > What about having 2 TLPs? > > Actually OpenEJB is still very valuable as own standalone project. > > So I'd rather go for having TomEE AND OpenEJB as TLPs. > > It is already pretty much separated from the build structure. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > > To: "dev@openejb.apache.org" <dev@openejb.apache.org> > > Cc: > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 4:04 PM > > Subject: [DISCUSS] TomEE as the TLP name > > > > Since it came up in the other thread, good time to officially raise the > > discussion on how we want to identify ourselves as a TLP. > > > > There have been concerns raised on how we identify to the public in > terms of our > > primary identity -- "the website says TomEE in letters as big as my > > hand" was one quote. This was many months ago and my feedback then was > > we're still experimenting and we need time to figure ourselves out. > > > > It's been a year since TomEE has been released and officially certified. > > The popularity is skyrocketing with no signs of slowing. As TomEE > eclipses > > OpenEJB it becomes more and more strange to call the TLP OpenEJB given > our > > website says TomEE all over it and that's all we present at conferences. > > > > What do people think about renaming this TLP from OpenEJB to TomEE? > > > > > > -David > > >
