Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 15:06, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> a
écrit :

> On 09/10/2018 14:03, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 14:33, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org>
> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> On 09/10/2018 13:18, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >>> hi folks!
> >>>
> >>> The OpenJPA codebase is big and mature.
> >>> That kind of cries for using feature branches for some parts.
> >>> And while SVN is great overall, branching is still problematic.
> >>>
> >>> Right now I would love to move from junit3 to 5.
> >>> But that isn't possible in one commit. It needs some branch. And this
> is
> >> pure pain in SVN.
> >>> So what about migrating OpenJPA over from SVN to GIT?
> >>>
> >>> Wdyt?
> >> +1 for git with github mirroring
> >> +0 for gitbox
> >>
> > Curious on that vote: gitbox is mainly asf github so makes it easy to
> > handle pr whereas old git asf (deprecated) with mirroring does not get
> > github features. Why do you prefer the other solution?
>
> Is "old git asf" deprecated? Really?
>

IIRC gitbox is encouraged today but we can cross check with infra.


> I am quite comfortable with PR handling with ASF git, and don't miss any
> other github feature.
>
> Simply, I don't see any enough reasons to further bind to github but if
> the community wants that, I won't object.
>

Ok so more a "go git" then we'll sort the detail with infra advices.

Thanks for the clarification


> Regards.
>
> --
> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>
> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> http://www.tirasa.net/
>
> Member at The Apache Software Foundation
> Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
> http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>
>

Reply via email to