Infra clearly prefers gitbox these days. And again: all our stuff is _still_ hosted on ASF hardware! gitbox is really just a more fancy mirroring to GitHub + better integration.
LieGrue, strub > Am 09.10.2018 um 14:19 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > Maybe let's tackle gitbox/git wip topic before a vote > > I thought gitbox was real github repo and therefore gives github power on > contribution side - agree bugtracker of github must be disabled. > > Can you check it Mark please? Im in a conf the whole week so not that easy > but think it is the main point. If both are asf we should just ask infra > what they prefer cause at the end it does not impact us (dev) much IMHO. > > Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 15:15, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a > écrit : > >> As far as I understand all cannonical git repos are still always hosted at >> ASF. Even for gitbox. But the integration is much tighter. >> And ftr: I also don't really like all the github binding. And we sill >> still continue to use JIRA and our ASF mailing lists etc. >> I'm even in favour to disable the github bug tracker etc. >> >> One more question: Do we want to treat this as VOTE thread or should I >> start another official VOTE thread for it? >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >>> Am 09.10.2018 um 14:06 schrieb Francesco Chicchiriccò < >> ilgro...@apache.org>: >>> >>> On 09/10/2018 14:03, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>> Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 14:33, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> >> a >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>>> On 09/10/2018 13:18, Mark Struberg wrote: >>>>>> hi folks! >>>>>> >>>>>> The OpenJPA codebase is big and mature. >>>>>> That kind of cries for using feature branches for some parts. >>>>>> And while SVN is great overall, branching is still problematic. >>>>>> >>>>>> Right now I would love to move from junit3 to 5. >>>>>> But that isn't possible in one commit. It needs some branch. And this >> is >>>>> pure pain in SVN. >>>>>> So what about migrating OpenJPA over from SVN to GIT? >>>>>> >>>>>> Wdyt? >>>>> +1 for git with github mirroring >>>>> +0 for gitbox >>>>> >>>> Curious on that vote: gitbox is mainly asf github so makes it easy to >>>> handle pr whereas old git asf (deprecated) with mirroring does not get >>>> github features. Why do you prefer the other solution? >>> >>> Is "old git asf" deprecated? Really? >>> >>> I am quite comfortable with PR handling with ASF git, and don't miss any >> other github feature. >>> >>> Simply, I don't see any enough reasons to further bind to github but if >> the community wants that, I won't object. >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> -- >>> Francesco Chicchiriccò >>> >>> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence >>> http://www.tirasa.net/ >>> >>> Member at The Apache Software Foundation >>> Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail >>> http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ >> >>
