We moved to gitbox since "old git asf" doesn't allow PR merging On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 19:06, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 09/10/2018 14:03, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 14:33, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> > a > > écrit : > > > >> On 09/10/2018 13:18, Mark Struberg wrote: > >>> hi folks! > >>> > >>> The OpenJPA codebase is big and mature. > >>> That kind of cries for using feature branches for some parts. > >>> And while SVN is great overall, branching is still problematic. > >>> > >>> Right now I would love to move from junit3 to 5. > >>> But that isn't possible in one commit. It needs some branch. And this > is > >> pure pain in SVN. > >>> So what about migrating OpenJPA over from SVN to GIT? > >>> > >>> Wdyt? > >> +1 for git with github mirroring > >> +0 for gitbox > >> > > Curious on that vote: gitbox is mainly asf github so makes it easy to > > handle pr whereas old git asf (deprecated) with mirroring does not get > > github features. Why do you prefer the other solution? > > Is "old git asf" deprecated? Really? > > I am quite comfortable with PR handling with ASF git, and don't miss any > other github feature. > > Simply, I don't see any enough reasons to further bind to github but if > the community wants that, I won't object. > > Regards. > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Member at The Apache Software Foundation > Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
