Hi Maxim, ignoreTimezone to true partially resolves the issue.
With ignoreTimezone you can decide that the Calendar UI shows the event in either the Browser/OS/Client side timezone (ignoreTimezone=false) OR the the server side timezone (ignoreTimezone=true) We neither want both, we want the events to be displayed in the timezone of the OpenMeetings user, and that can be configured different from the browser/os and server timezone. The idea would be that the server does send the Date/Time in the OpenMeetings user timezone, and we will set ignoreTimezone to true. Unfortunatelly this is currently not possible with wicket-jquery-ui as the needed API's are not overwritable / public. I have made a pull request to the wicket-jquery-ui to fix that: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/pull/52 Can somebody contact sebfz? Maxim, you mentioned you are in contact with him? Thanks, Sebastian 2013/8/1 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > I actively talk with Sebastien (the author of wicket-jquery-ui). > His project consist of different parts with different licences (for example > Kendo* plugins are GPLv3 licensed) > I only took parts licenced under compitible licenses. > > I can write him a letter to add NOTICE, should I? > > For the changes to the FullCalendar I would: > 1) read the documentation (it has 'ignoretimezone' option which might help > 2) take a look at the current issues, for ex. this one > https://github.com/arshaw/fullcalendar/pull/92 > 3) propose the patch to the author > 4) hacking ourselves :) > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:48 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < > seba.wag...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Okay but it seems like it is Apache Licensed: > > https://code.google.com/p/wicket-jquery-ui/ > > > > But wicket-jquery-ui includes other libraries that are under the MIT > > license. So he would need a NOTICE file (According to our rules). > > > > Its really a bit messy, I think we should clean that up and add the > > FullCalendar to our NOTICE file to make sure nobody raises concerns about > > the legal status of our project. > > > > Sebastian > > > > > > 2013/8/1 seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> > > > > > I am afraid some of our changes that are required for instance for > making > > > it timezone safe will be much easier if we simply do it. > > > And also their use will be relatively limited to what we want to do > with > > > it. So its unlikely that it will be useful for anybody else. > > > > > > We can then discuss how and when those changes will become part of > > > wicket-jquery-ui. > > > > > > For me it seems like the author of wicket-jquery-ui does not care about > > > the license at all. There is not even a License file or any kind of > > header > > > in the source code of his file. > > > So in theory that can literally mean that he can decide tomorrow he > will > > > license it under whatever he wants it to be. > > > > > > That is a bit scary for us. We can't just include a library without > > having > > > a correct attribution of the License. > > > > > > I know there was put a bit of effort into using this library now, but > if > > > we release it and there will be doubts raised about this it could mean > we > > > have to replace the entire library. > > > > > > Was anybody able to actively talk to the author of that > wicket-jquery-ui > > ? > > > Cause if that guy does not respond to any emails its really kind of > > > dangerous to base our application on the hope he will not suddenly > change > > > his mind and put the code under a license we don't like. > > > > > > Sebastian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/8/1 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> Hello Sebastian! > > >> > > >> we actually do not distribute the fullcalendar.js. > > >> We are using wicket-jquery-ui which ships fullcalendar for as. > > >> > > >> Despite wicket-jquery-ui allows to replace almost any resource with > > custom > > >> one, I would start from proposing our patch to the author since it > would > > >> be > > >> easier to maintain in the future. (Already was done with > > wicket-jquery-ui, > > >> wicket and some jquery libraries) > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:36 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < > > >> seba.wag...@gmail.com > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi, > > >> > > > >> > the OpenMeetings project would like to redistribute the jQuery > Plugin > > >> > "Fullcalendar": > > >> > http://arshaw.com/fullcalendar/ > > >> > > > >> > As part of its distribution. Which itself should not be a problem: > > >> > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#category-a > > >> > > > >> > But we also might need to modify some of the source code to fit our > > >> needs. > > >> > > > >> > Are we allowed to do that? > > >> > Are there changes to NOTES files needed when we do that ? > > >> > > > >> > I've somebody knows an answer to that or pointers to the FAQ where > > this > > >> > would be covered, I would much appreciate. > > >> > But I think the FAQ don't cover that topic yet. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > Sebastian > > >> > -- > > >> > Sebastian Wagner > > >> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > >> > http://www.webbase-design.de > > >> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > >> > seba.wag...@gmail.com > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> WBR > > >> Maxim aka solomax > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sebastian Wagner > > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > > http://www.webbase-design.de > > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > > seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sebastian Wagner > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > http://www.webbase-design.de > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > seba.wag...@gmail.com > > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com seba.wag...@gmail.com
