Hi Sebastien, thanks for that! It definitely opens it up. I will let you know once we have been able to refactor the code to work for our use case.
Thanks, Sebastian 2013/8/5 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > Thanks! > Will look through our code > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Maxim, >> >> I did not had the time to write the release note yet... Please be sure to >> have read this: >> >> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/wiki/%5Bchangelog%5D-wicket-jquery-ui-6.9.1 >> >> Thanks & best regards, >> Sebastien >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Found the new build! >>> Thanks! going to test it today and report back :) >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Maxim, Hi Sebastian, >>>> >>>> I took care of your request, but I did it manually yesterday morning >>>> because I lost my Internet connectivity... >>>> So, the only difference is that I just named getCalendarModelBehavior, >>>> newCalendarModelBehavior for consistencies reasons. >>>> >>>> If I understood your needs, I am seeing a usage like: >>>> >>>> class MyCalendar extends Calendar >>>> { >>>> public MyCalendar(String id, CalendarModel model, Options >>>> options) >>>> { >>>> super(id, model, options); >>>> } >>>> >>>> @Override >>>> protected CalendarModelBehavior >>>> newCalendarModelBehavior(CalendarModel model) >>>> { >>>> return new TimeZoneCalendarModelBehavior(model) { >>>> >>>> @Override >>>> public TimeZone getTimeZone() >>>> { >>>> return TimeZone.getTimeZone("America/Los_Angeles"); >>>> //to be configured >>>> } >>>> }; >>>> } >>>> } >>>> >>>> static abstract class TimeZoneCalendarModelBehavior extends >>>> CalendarModelBehavior >>>> { >>>> public TimeZoneCalendarModelBehavior(CalendarModel model) >>>> { >>>> super(model); >>>> } >>>> >>>> public abstract TimeZone getTimeZone(); >>>> } >>>> >>>> I may be interested with your implementation of the >>>> "TimeZoneCalendarModelBehavior", either to merge it into >>>> CalendarModelBehavior or to provide it as an alternative of >>>> CalendarModelBehavior, if a user wishes to achieve the same use case... >>>> >>>> >>>> On another topic, I read your conversation bellow and your legitimate >>>> concerns about licensing (1) and my availability (2). >>>> >>>> (1) - The whole code is ASF2 licensed and that will never change. >>>> Except the sample site, for readability reason, all files (java, html) >>>> *does* have the license header. Sure, wicket-jquery-ui relies on js >>>> libraries that may have different licensing, and it is up to the user to >>>> take care of this (and Maxim took care actually). Anyway, I will add a >>>> NOTICE / LICENSE file to the project... >>>> >>>> (2) - I usually answering mail with 24 hours max. Sometime more if I am >>>> on vacation, naturally. But I also know that, for now on, I am the only one >>>> who is (physically) able to maintain/deploy wicket-jquery-ui releases. I >>>> understand that it could be a problem to rely on only one man... I will >>>> send to Martin Grigorov (Apache Wicket commiter) the "keys" of the project, >>>> in case of something happens to me... (for instance I found the love of my >>>> live, and go suddenly living somewhere, where there is no internet, >>>> electricity, etc :) ). wicket-jquery-ui has now thousand(s?) users, I am >>>> sure there will be someone who can took the relay... >>>> >>>> Thanks & best regards, >>>> Sebastien >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Maxim Solodovnik >>>> <solomax...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Sebastien, >>>>> >>>>> could you please take a look at >>>>> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/pull/52 ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance! >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>> From: seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> >>>>> Date: Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 10:21 AM >>>>> Subject: Pull request to jquery-wicket-ui for fixing some API to be >>>>> customizable >>>>> To: dev <dev@openmeetings.apache.org> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Maxim, >>>>> >>>>> ignoreTimezone to true partially resolves the issue. >>>>> >>>>> With ignoreTimezone you can decide that the Calendar UI shows the >>>>> event in >>>>> either the Browser/OS/Client side timezone (ignoreTimezone=false) OR >>>>> the >>>>> the server side timezone (ignoreTimezone=true) >>>>> >>>>> We neither want both, we want the events to be displayed in the >>>>> timezone of >>>>> the OpenMeetings user, and that can be configured different from the >>>>> browser/os and server timezone. >>>>> >>>>> The idea would be that the server does send the Date/Time in the >>>>> OpenMeetings user timezone, and we will set ignoreTimezone to true. >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunatelly this is currently not possible with wicket-jquery-ui as >>>>> the >>>>> needed API's are not overwritable / public. >>>>> >>>>> I have made a pull request to the wicket-jquery-ui to fix that: >>>>> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/pull/52 >>>>> >>>>> Can somebody contact sebfz? Maxim, you mentioned you are in contact >>>>> with >>>>> him? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Sebastian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2013/8/1 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> > I actively talk with Sebastien (the author of wicket-jquery-ui). >>>>> > His project consist of different parts with different licences (for >>>>> example >>>>> > Kendo* plugins are GPLv3 licensed) >>>>> > I only took parts licenced under compitible licenses. >>>>> > >>>>> > I can write him a letter to add NOTICE, should I? >>>>> > >>>>> > For the changes to the FullCalendar I would: >>>>> > 1) read the documentation (it has 'ignoretimezone' option which >>>>> might help >>>>> > 2) take a look at the current issues, for ex. this one >>>>> > https://github.com/arshaw/fullcalendar/pull/92 >>>>> > 3) propose the patch to the author >>>>> > 4) hacking ourselves :) >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:48 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < >>>>> > seba.wag...@gmail.com >>>>> > > wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > Okay but it seems like it is Apache Licensed: >>>>> > > https://code.google.com/p/wicket-jquery-ui/ >>>>> > > >>>>> > > But wicket-jquery-ui includes other libraries that are under the >>>>> MIT >>>>> > > license. So he would need a NOTICE file (According to our rules). >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Its really a bit messy, I think we should clean that up and add the >>>>> > > FullCalendar to our NOTICE file to make sure nobody raises >>>>> concerns about >>>>> > > the legal status of our project. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Sebastian >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > 2013/8/1 seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > I am afraid some of our changes that are required for instance >>>>> for >>>>> > making >>>>> > > > it timezone safe will be much easier if we simply do it. >>>>> > > > And also their use will be relatively limited to what we want to >>>>> do >>>>> > with >>>>> > > > it. So its unlikely that it will be useful for anybody else. >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > We can then discuss how and when those changes will become part >>>>> of >>>>> > > > wicket-jquery-ui. >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > For me it seems like the author of wicket-jquery-ui does not >>>>> care about >>>>> > > > the license at all. There is not even a License file or any kind >>>>> of >>>>> > > header >>>>> > > > in the source code of his file. >>>>> > > > So in theory that can literally mean that he can decide tomorrow >>>>> he >>>>> > will >>>>> > > > license it under whatever he wants it to be. >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > That is a bit scary for us. We can't just include a library >>>>> without >>>>> > > having >>>>> > > > a correct attribution of the License. >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > I know there was put a bit of effort into using this library >>>>> now, but >>>>> > if >>>>> > > > we release it and there will be doubts raised about this it >>>>> could mean >>>>> > we >>>>> > > > have to replace the entire library. >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > Was anybody able to actively talk to the author of that >>>>> > wicket-jquery-ui >>>>> > > ? >>>>> > > > Cause if that guy does not respond to any emails its really kind >>>>> of >>>>> > > > dangerous to base our application on the hope he will not >>>>> suddenly >>>>> > change >>>>> > > > his mind and put the code under a license we don't like. >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > Sebastian >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > 2013/8/1 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > >> Hello Sebastian! >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> we actually do not distribute the fullcalendar.js. >>>>> > > >> We are using wicket-jquery-ui which ships fullcalendar for as. >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> Despite wicket-jquery-ui allows to replace almost any resource >>>>> with >>>>> > > custom >>>>> > > >> one, I would start from proposing our patch to the author since >>>>> it >>>>> > would >>>>> > > >> be >>>>> > > >> easier to maintain in the future. (Already was done with >>>>> > > wicket-jquery-ui, >>>>> > > >> wicket and some jquery libraries) >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:36 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < >>>>> > > >> seba.wag...@gmail.com >>>>> > > >> > wrote: >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> > Hi, >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > > >> > the OpenMeetings project would like to redistribute the jQuery >>>>> > Plugin >>>>> > > >> > "Fullcalendar": >>>>> > > >> > http://arshaw.com/fullcalendar/ >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > > >> > As part of its distribution. Which itself should not be a >>>>> problem: >>>>> > > >> > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#category-a >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > > >> > But we also might need to modify some of the source code to >>>>> fit our >>>>> > > >> needs. >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > > >> > Are we allowed to do that? >>>>> > > >> > Are there changes to NOTES files needed when we do that ? >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > > >> > I've somebody knows an answer to that or pointers to the FAQ >>>>> where >>>>> > > this >>>>> > > >> > would be covered, I would much appreciate. >>>>> > > >> > But I think the FAQ don't cover that topic yet. >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > > >> > Thanks, >>>>> > > >> > Sebastian >>>>> > > >> > -- >>>>> > > >> > Sebastian Wagner >>>>> > > >> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>>> > > >> > http://www.webbase-design.de >>>>> > > >> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >>>>> > > >> > seba.wag...@gmail.com >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com seba.wag...@gmail.com
