Am 01/11/2013 12:03 AM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:53:40 +0100
"Marcus (OOo)"<marcus.m...@wtnet.de>  wrote:

Am 01/10/2013 11:40 PM, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
Hello Marcus;


----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: Marcus (OOo)



   I learned about these claims via email, but not from the TDF mailing
   list.  But I would not be surprised if it originated there.  In any
   case, when a TDF Director and Marketing Lead makes such claims, it
   carries some weight, and if utterly false the claims should be
   rebutted.  IMHO.


   The "TDF director and Marketing Lead" does no development and
doesn't really have any idea what is going on here.

   Why is that surprising or why should we blog about it? It looks to me
   like he just wants to bring some attention to his project.

   Pedro.

Because it's not a relatively small part but the Symphony code will
(IMHO) play a bigger role in coming AOO releases, e.g., improvements in
the UI and accessibility.


The code is in the tree, we have Wikis describing the changes and
we have people working on them. I don't think we gain anything by
getting drawn into a communication war about this. Let's wait until
4.0 takes shape.

So, I think in this case an exception from the usual way would be
appropriate.

Maybe, it was just a thought why it would be good this time.

Me wonders what is the usual way ;-).

Kay has described it perfectly. ;-)

Marcus


I would suggest merely an informative blog, not in reply to anyone, a blog 
telling of what was happening in the AOO world and what work was currently 
under way.  Of couse things are mapped out on the mailing lists, but the world 
of AOO users is far wider than those and they deserve to be kept informed.

Sure, I don't thought about a direct reply but as you suggested to write in general.

Marcus

Reply via email to