On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > On 16/01/2013 Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> >>> the Symphony contribution in itself is worth to be >>> properly acknowledged and get exposure. >> >> Agreed. So I am glad then that you made the call for additional blog >> authors. It is probably best if the Symphony contribution is >> acknowledged, etc., by a non-IBM project member. That would make it >> harder to dismiss it in some quarters. > > > I can try to understand these concerns, but from a practical point of view > it is quite difficult for someone who is not a (former) Symphony team > member, or who wasn't involved with porting code from Symphony, to write a > meaningful post about the improvements that the Symphony contribution made > possible. >
Well, much of the material is on the wiki. And we probably don't want to get too technical. But I can put a draft together at least. -Rob > For example, analyzing the hundreds of [From Symphony] issues would not be > feasible for me. Well, let's see if someone else takes the challenge, but > honestly there's nobody better than the people who know Symphony to describe > what was ported and what areas will benefit from its code most... > > Regards, > Andrea.
