On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > On 04/02/2013 janI wrote: >> >> We have just completed the last optimization of wiki.o.o, which means that >> it has entered maintenance mode. > > > Thanks a lot for your efforts! Getting full control over the wiki again is a > milestone for this project. > > >> - Move cwiki to mwiki. >> this has been discussed/decided earlier, but might need a positive >> decision. > > > I agree, we can progressively move stuff by turning pages into redirects to > the MWiki. This may take time but could be the less problematic way (for > example, I had created the FOSDEM pages on the cwiki but they should be > moved to the mwiki since other FOSDEM pages are archived there). A drastic > redirect could confuse people who are actively working on some pages, like > the logo discussions. > > Is there some filter to allow smooth translation of cwiki syntax? > > And note, not to miss anything we actually have two cwikis: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOODEV > but the former is the only one with some meaningful content, the second is > almost empty. > > >> - Mark outdated paged with category outdated, and symbol on page > > > I use this: > http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Features&diff=214742&oldid=189126 > which produces a clear "Outdated" notice and categorizes the page > accordingly. If there are better ways, let me know. > > I tend to do that on all pages I stumble upon that are clearly outdated. >
There are two different concepts to think about: 1) This page is out of date -- please help update me. 2) This page is out of date -- we keep it here for historical reference only Maybe we need two different tags? -Rob > Regards, > Andrea.
