On 4/15/13 1:42 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Am 15.04.13 13:34, schrieb Rob Weir: >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >> <jogischm...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> On 4/15/13 12:22 PM, janI wrote: >>>> On 15 April 2013 11:53, Raphael Bircher <r.birc...@gmx.ch> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi at all >>>>> >>>>> I'm a bit comfused. What I get for %PRODUCTNAME? It is "OpenOffice" or >>>>> "Apache OpenOffice"? Thanks for your Feedback. >>>>> >>>>> On my system I get "Apache OpenOffice", but I am not sure that it is >>> like >>>> in every part of the system (but it should be) >>> no, it is not so easy and I am sure Oliver can provide more details. We >>> decided to use OpenOffice in most of the places in the installed product >>> and use Apache OpenOfifce only in the intro screen or the about dialog. >>> >>> >> The About Box is where we claim the copyright and give the license, so >> that >> is one place where it will be important to use the full formal name of >> the >> product. >> >> Maybe we should have %PRODUCTNAMESHORT and %PRODUCTNAMEFULL > The question is, if this makes sense for downstream products. Well, it's > anyway better then hard coded productnames.
I see no problem here because both can be defined on the same or whatever you want. But to be serious I am tending to drop the flexibility here, as long as I don't see that downstream products contribute back. Juergen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
