On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:58:54 +0200
RGB ES <rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2013/6/11 Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
> 
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Fernando Cassia <fcas...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Andre Fischer <awf....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I just read this article [1] on the Register: "Apache devs: 'We'll ship
> > no
> > >> OpenOffice before its time'"
> > >>
> > >> It is sad that it has the usual misinformation:
> > >>
> > >
> > > You should find the email of the publication's news editor and write a
> > > polite yet firm complaint, saying in fewer words what you said here, put
> > > the writer in cc:, then lay back and enjoy the fireworks. It also helps
> > if
> > > you put such letter on-line and reference it in your e-mail.
> > >
> > > Just an idea.. ;-)
> > >
> >
> > I think just ignore it.  Why help promote El Reg?
> >
> > Look at the numbers:
> >
> > www.openoffice.org: Alexa Traffic Rank #3715:
> > http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/openoffice.org
> >
> > theregister.co.uk: Alexa Traffic Rank  #4251:
> > http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/theregister.co.uk
> >
> > In other words, our website gets more traffic than their news site does.
> >
> > And libreoffice.org is ranked #8163:
> > http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/libreoffice.org
> >
> > So the best strategy is to ignore the the FUD and push accurate and
> > useful information onto our website.  That approach reaches more
> > users, and is under our control.
> >
> 
> +1. Talking about sites like El Reg means promoting them, and promotion
> means more weight on search engines for those lies which is against our own
> interest so let them shout alone on their corner. We need to be verbose
> about what we do, not about what others say we don't.
> 
> Regards
> Ricardo
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -Rob
> >
> >
> > > FC
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a
> > revolutionary
> > > act
> > > Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un
> > Acto
> > > Revolucionario
> > > - George Orwell

Also it is an article which parrots from a limited set of sources, with _no_ 
attempt by the author to confirm any of the assertions in such sources, with a 
preponderance of selection from LibO sources.  Any academic of any standing 
would throw this out as a piece of research.



-- 
Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to