On 13 August 2013 15:14, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > first if all I volunteer to act as the release manager for AOO 4.0.1 if
> > that is wanted but I am also open to let somebody else to the job ;-)
> >
>
> It is probably best if you continue, since 4.0.1 is very closely
> related to 4.0.0, and you already have the build environment set up,
> etc.
>
+1

>
> > In preparation for an AOO 4.0.1 release I have first created a AOO400
> > tag based on revision 1503704. I have also created a new branch AOO401
> > based on branch AOO400 based on the head revision of the branch.
> >
> > I noticed that Yuri checked in some code on the branch already. Can we
> > please follow some guideline how we handle such release branches?
> >
> > I would like to propose the following:
> >
> > Changes on a release branch should be discussed before and should be in
> > relation to a proposed and approved fix (if you want showstopper) that
> > will go in the next release.
> >
> >
> > For now that means the branch AOO400 is dead and changes towards AOO
> > 4.0.1 have to be made on the new branch AOO401 and should be discussed
> > first. Or propose the related issue as showstopper first.
> >
> > I believe we agreed more or less to keep the changes for AOO 4.0.1
> > minimal to reduce the test effort. We should concentrate on the most
> > serious issues only and on new languages or improved translations. Keep
> > in mind that AOO 4.1 is coming as well. Stability is a key feature and
> > every single bug fix can introduce a regression as well. Often not
> > obvious directly.
> >
>
> I assume we also want to avoid introducing new UI strings?   Otherwise
> we'd require translation updates on all languages.
>

I would formulate it stronger: we cannot allow new strings, unless it is
absolutely unavoidable.


>
> >
> > Any opinions or comment son this plan.
> >
>
> Should we create new Release Notes?  Or augment the existing 4.0.0
> ones?   It might be simpler if 4.0.x releases share the same release
> notes, but we start with fresh ones for 4.1?
>

Lets share release notes, amend so that is clear what is only available in
4.0.1, and start from a fresh with 4.1

I also assume that 4.0.1 will simply overwrite 4.0 exe on mirrors etc.

rgds
jan I.


>
> -Rob
>
> > Juergen
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to