On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:18 AM, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 26 October 2013 19:41, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 8:40 AM, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I was just thinking, because I just merged l10n40 from trunk and got
> very
> > > tired.
> > >
> > > I think your idea of making it easy for translators and also
> documenters
> > is
> > > real good.
> > >
> > > But you have spare cycles to spare for this, why not approach it
> > > differently and decouple the help system. Somewhere in the code (I dont
> > > know where, but you may know), the help system is called with an id. If
> > we
> > > branch at that point to call a standard help system instead it would be
> > > decoupled.
> > >
> > > If you could do the decoupling, I can for sure help transform the
> current
> > > help into whatever format is required for a new help system. At the
> > moment
> > > I burn cycles comprehending what happens, I dare not start thinking
> > "why",
> > > I am pretty sure that with the same resource usage we could make a help
> > > system based on todays help standard.
> > >
> >
> > I think this has been suggested in the past as well, and maybe what I'm
> > trying to do will be a first step to this. At this point, I don't know
> > where/how the Help system get launched.
> >
> > It would make sense to put the "help" stuff in its own svn area like we
> do
> > with "extras" for example, and then go from there at least. A ways down
> the
> > road I think.
> >
> It would make the whole translation process (new one) more difficult if
> help was in its own area, because right now all references are within main,
> and its simple to expect all modules in main to be at same level, I dont
> consider it simple to secure that 2 (or more) different svn areas are at
> the same level. If they happen to be at different level and someone
> generates templates it will go wrong, because keys will not match and wrong
> messages will be extracted.
>

Ah! well I did say I had not explored connectivity to help at all at this
point. :/


>
> Why do you think it would help with its own area, whether you write
> main/helpcontent2 or helpcontent2 does not make a difference or ?
>

More thought needed...


>
>
> >
> > Thanks for your support and willingness to help.
> >
> No problem, its just returning the help I needed :-)
>
> rgds
> jan I.
>
>
> >
> >
> > > just my idea a saturday afternoon, where I see someone change the
> > > readmelicense.xrm and my parser broke.
> > >
> > > rgds
> > > jan I.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 25 October 2013 21:42, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 25 October 2013 18:33, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:36 PM, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > On 25 October 2013 01:06, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > [top posting]
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > never mind on this question. I found the answer -- I didn't do a
> > > last
> > > >> > step.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Sorry for the noise.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > the makefiles in helpcontent2, are like good italian spaghetti,
> > > >> especially
> > > >> > the util directories, where parts of what was done in source is
> > > >> > overwritten.
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> ??? I need to take a closer look at what you're saying here...this
> is
> > > >> exactly where I stopped looking yesterday.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > tell me if I can help. In branch l10n40 you can see some of the
> > changed I
> > > > had to do to make it work. My biggest problem was the .tree files,
> and
> > > the
> > > > fact that whereas most input files are in source some of them (index
> > etc)
> > > > is in util for SOME not all of the parts.
> > > >
> > > > Let me know if I can help.
> > > >
> > > > rgds
> > > > jan I.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I have integrated genLang here, but its on my list to strip the
> > > >> makefiles
> > > >> > down to what we use (today).
> > > >> >
> > > >> > rgds
> > > >> > jan I.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> Well, as it turns out, my "problem" is not solved. The jars I'm
> > looking
> > > >> for
> > > >> "supposedly" get generated in the makefile in helpcontent2/util,
> > > >> but...still no jars.
> > > >>
> > > >> As per the old instructions, I got into helpcontent2 and just did a
> > > build.
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm trying to figure out what's required to just deal with the help
> > > files
> > > >> -- editing/seeing results -- apart from a complete build of the
> > product.
> > > >> What I'm thinking is we might be able to kludge some simple config
> for
> > > >> users interested in just tech writing for this area.
> > > >>
> > > >> more later...after more trials
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Kay Schenk <
> kay.sch...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > I'm trying to find my way around the bundled help with AOO --
> > how
> > > to
> > > >> > put
> > > >> > > > stuff in, how to build etc to see changes.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > So, I made some changes and followed instructions for building
> > in:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://www.openoffice.org/documentation/online_help/OOo2HelpAuthoring.pdf
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > pp. 21, 22
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > This was building ONLY helpcontent2.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Some things happened -- new zip files were created but not the
> > > .jar
> > > >> > files
> > > >> > > > FROM the zip files found in <openoffice4-location>/help
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Can anyone tell me what needs to be built next to make this
> > > happen?
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I've done a bunch of searches on some of the makefiles etc but
> > > can't
> > > >> > > > readily find this. Thanks for any help on Help. :}
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > --
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > MzK
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
> > > >> > > >  Nothing is going to get better. It's not.”
> > > >> > > >                           -- Dr. Seuss, The Lorax
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > MzK
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
> > > >> > >  Nothing is going to get better. It's not.”
> > > >> > >                           -- Dr. Seuss, The Lorax
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> MzK
> > > >>
> > > >> “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
> > > >>  Nothing is going to get better. It's not.”
> > > >>                           -- Dr. Seuss, The Lorax
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > MzK
> >
> > “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
> >  Nothing is going to get better. It's not.”
> >                           -- Dr. Seuss, The Lorax
> >
>



-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

“Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
 Nothing is going to get better. It's not.”
                          -- Dr. Seuss, The Lorax

Reply via email to