On 3/6/14 9:20 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 3/5/14 10:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> Am 03/04/2014 07:31 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >>> On 3/3/14 9:24 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>>> Am 02/14/2014 09:53 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): >>>>> As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify >>>>> some things before it's maybe too late to change the facts and to >>>>> prepare webpages: >>>>> >>>>> 3. File names: >>>>> >>>>> Of course the file names of the install files have to show a difference >>>>> compared to the general release files. Suggestion: >>>>> >>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta_Win_x86_install.exe >>>>> >>>>> *If* there is a need to publish another round, it could be extended >>>>> with >>>>> a number like: >>>>> >>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta2_Win_x86_install.exe >>>> >>>> OK, I've learned that this won't be possible and the names will be >>>> slightly different - but only as long as they are not uploaded to >>>> Sourceforge. Therefore I suggest to rename them to the synxtax that was >>>> used before (see above). >>>> >>>> I've created already a little shell script to do the work but won't >>>> attach here. >>>> >>>> @Juergen: Is this something for you? >>> >>> no and I am not in favor or changing the names. I would like to use the >>> names as they came out of the build. >>> >>> Please point me to the scripts that build the name for the download. It >>> should be easy to put the beta string in the correct position. >> >> You want to edit the download scripting but not doing a 1 minute file >> renaming? Hm ;-) > > I said that I would like to use the bits that comes out of the build > process directly without any further touching. > > >> >>> We have already said why the naming scheme is different and that it >>> requires more time to analyze and tweak the build process for a proper >>> naming. We hope that we can cleanup and improve this for the next >>> release. >> >> I have not asked to change the names in the build system but what comes >> out of it. > > I know that but every extra step in the release phase that is not > necessary shoudl be avoided. Changing the download script should be > trivial as well. > > Nobody can say if we really will work on this cleanup and time for it. > That means tweak the existing process to the names the build produce and > not introduce a further step. > > >> >>> But for now I would like to avoid any extra step and the change in the >>> download script is one place. Otherwise I have to change several places >>> where I automate some pre-release steps. >> >> So, it seems you or me have to change something in order to get working >> download. >> >> OK, don't worry I'll take care of it. > > again, point us to the relevant scripts or better to the place where I > can find instructions to do that for cases where you are not available.
an overview of the Beta files can found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/test/4.1.0-beta_files.txt IT is not yet 100% complete because the Linux upload is still ongoing. I will update it asap Juergen > > Juergen > >> >> Marcus >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
