On 3/6/14 11:01 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 03/06/2014 01:19 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >> On 3/6/14 9:20 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> On 3/5/14 10:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>>> Am 03/04/2014 07:31 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >>>>> On 3/3/14 9:24 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >>>>>> Am 02/14/2014 09:53 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): >>>>>>> As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify >>>>>>> some things before it's maybe too late to change the facts and to >>>>>>> prepare webpages: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 3. File names: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of course the file names of the install files have to show a >>>>>>> difference >>>>>>> compared to the general release files. Suggestion: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta_Win_x86_install.exe >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *If* there is a need to publish another round, it could be extended >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> a number like: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta2_Win_x86_install.exe >>>>>> >>>>>> OK, I've learned that this won't be possible and the names will be >>>>>> slightly different - but only as long as they are not uploaded to >>>>>> Sourceforge. Therefore I suggest to rename them to the synxtax >>>>>> that was >>>>>> used before (see above). >>>>>> >>>>>> I've created already a little shell script to do the work but won't >>>>>> attach here. >>>>>> >>>>>> @Juergen: Is this something for you? >>>>> >>>>> no and I am not in favor or changing the names. I would like to use >>>>> the >>>>> names as they came out of the build. >>>>> >>>>> Please point me to the scripts that build the name for the >>>>> download. It >>>>> should be easy to put the beta string in the correct position. >>>> >>>> You want to edit the download scripting but not doing a 1 minute file >>>> renaming? Hm ;-) >>> >>> I said that I would like to use the bits that comes out of the build >>> process directly without any further touching. >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> We have already said why the naming scheme is different and that it >>>>> requires more time to analyze and tweak the build process for a proper >>>>> naming. We hope that we can cleanup and improve this for the next >>>>> release. >>>> >>>> I have not asked to change the names in the build system but what comes >>>> out of it. >>> >>> I know that but every extra step in the release phase that is not >>> necessary shoudl be avoided. Changing the download script should be >>> trivial as well. >>> >>> Nobody can say if we really will work on this cleanup and time for it. >>> That means tweak the existing process to the names the build produce and >>> not introduce a further step. >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> But for now I would like to avoid any extra step and the change in the >>>>> download script is one place. Otherwise I have to change several >>>>> places >>>>> where I automate some pre-release steps. >>>> >>>> So, it seems you or me have to change something in order to get working >>>> download. >>>> >>>> OK, don't worry I'll take care of it. >>> >>> again, point us to the relevant scripts or better to the place where I >>> can find instructions to do that for cases where you are not available. >> >> an overview of the Beta files can found under >> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/test/4.1.0-beta_files.txt >> >> IT is not yet 100% complete because the Linux upload is still ongoing. I >> will update it asap > > Thanks a lot :-) I will look for the missing files.
the file is updated and should contain now a listing of all files Juergen > > Marcus > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
