On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
> Am 05/03/2014 11:10 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> >>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html >>> >> >> It is progressing very nicely! >> >> What is working: >>> - Filesizes are shown for selected full install + langpack. >>> - Checksum links are shown for selected full install + langpack. >>> >> >> If I select Windows, Italian, 4.1.0 the MD5 checksum link is broken: >> >> http://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.0.1/binaries/it/ >> Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Win_x86_langpack_it.exe.md5 >> >> (note: 4.0.1 in first part of URL, 4.1.0 in second part) >> > > right, all checksum links were broken as the wrong base URL to Apache Dist > was used. Fixed now. > > > - When choices are done a little help icon is shown. Click on it to get >>> to a help text for "full install vs. langpack". >>> >> >> The two download buttons should then be styled appropriately (classic >> green button), since they are not very visible now. But as you said, all >> graphic style can be reviewed. And indeed we could replace the green box >> entirely, by just pre-filling the selection with guessed values. >> > > Yes, this will be the final result. Then we can look at the design. This is looking very good and working pretty well for me. I can't wait to see the final outcome! :) Ok, one little suggestion. I think it would be nice to have the Sourceforge "icon" actually used in the top green DL box instead of off to the side -- with a link to Sourceforge from that. Maybe we could get a slightly smaller version? one more comment below... > > I like the idea of an icon for explanations, but I would use an >> information sign (circled "i") there rather than the question mark, >> which seems to explain an error. >> > > OK, I will change it. > > > What is not yet working: >>> - The version dropdown box has no effect yet but it shows already how >>> it could work (likely). >>> >> >> Indeed, selecting "Mac OS X 32-bit" offers 4.1.0 too, but I think this >> is under control. >> > > Luckily it's the 64-bit file that is offered. ;-) But, yes, as soon as the > version selection is working, this exception has to be tested. > > > - I've not tested with all browsers. So, maybe something is not working. >>> >> >> Works fine for me, I tested with Firefox. >> > > Thanks > > > So, please have a look and don't hesitate to comment. >>> >> >> I would remove the "Reset" button too. It is useless (except for our >> tests!) and it looks too much like something the visitor should click >> upon just after selecting the version... >> > > Really? I'm pretty sure that the today's Internet users know what happens > when clicking on a button with the name "Reset" which is positioned > directly below such input and control fields. > > So, let's see what others think. > I'm not sure I understand the purpose of the Reset button either. Maybe remove it ? OK, tested with Firefox 29...all good with my Linux-32 setup. Good job and thanks for all your work on this. > > Thanks for your input. > > Marcus > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing." -- Helen Keller
