Hi Carl, Thanks for taking this on.
Some observations/questions inline. - Dennis > -----Original Message----- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 06:35 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars > to Apache Nexus repository > > Hi All, > > I'm finally getting a chance to work on the Maven packaging for the Java > UNO jar files. As part of this effort we need to submit a POM xml file > with org information. > Please review the sample below and let me know if you agree before I > bundle and load them to the staging area of the repository and call for > a vote. > The requirements are listed here [1] and the OpenOffice.org wiki page > for the 3.2.1 files are here [2]. This is the page I plan on updating > with new procedures. > > This example is for the ridl.jar file. In particular groupId, url, > license, scm, and developer. > Developer is now required so I put myself there as I don't know who is. > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; > xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 > http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";> > <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> > <groupId>org.apache.openoffice</groupId> > <artifactId>ridl</artifactId> > <version>4.1.2</version> > <packaging>jar</packaging> > <name>Java Runtime Interface Definition Library</name> > <description>The type library and the precompiled Java interfaces of > the UDK API.</description> > <url>http://openoffice.apache.org</url> [orcmid] I think a more-specific URL is needed to line up with the Artifact. The use of openoffice.apache.org seems too high-level (and is not openoffice.org better, although not the group name?). Is it useful to have more context in the <name> of the project artifact? Is this part of UDK? I think the question to ask is, what are we helping someone to find. > <licenses> > <license> > <name>The Apache License, Version 2.0</name> > <url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url> > </license> > </licenses> > <developers> > <developer> > <name>Carl Marcum</name> > <email>cmar...@apache.org</email> > <organization>Apache Software Foundation</organization> > <organizationUrl>http://www.apache.org</organizationUrl> > </developer> [orcmid] Since we cannot name all of the developers, I think a group developer might be better. That is, <developer> <name>Apache OpenOffice Project</name> <email>dev@openoffice.apache.org</email> </developer> This should line up better with the standard project notice on the source files. You could even have this in addition to your entry. It might be useful to have yours there as distribution [release] manager. > </developers> > <scm> > <connection>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk</connection > > > <developerConnection>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk</ > developerConnection> > <url>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk</url> [orcmid] Linking to the repository trunk seems too high level. Is there a closer URL for the repository for the (buildable) source of the artifact? > </scm> > <dependencies> > <!-- none --> > </dependencies> > </project> > > [1] http://central.sonatype.org/pages/requirements.html > [2] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Java/MavenBundles [orcmid] Will you link to the wiki page [2]? If so, please link to a specific history page, since there can be changes for future distributions, just as this is a change over the past. > > Thanks, > Carl > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
